In game 2 of their 1908 World Championship match the wily Lasker used a psychological ploy that will be discussed in the game notes to defeat the dogmatic Tarrasch.
1908… it was an interesting year. If you lived in New York City the Sullivan Ordinance was passed making it illegal for people who controlled public places to allow women to smoke in them. It was vetoed by Mayor George B. McClellan Jr. Also, it was in New York City that the first around-the-world car race began.
If you lived in Ohio the big news was the Collinwood (Cleveland) school fire which erupted on March 4, 1908, killing 172 students, two teachers and one rescuer in one of the deadliest school fires in United States history.
The old school was a fire trap. Its masonry exterior acted as a chimney, sucking flame upward as the wooden interior burned and open stairways enhanced the chimney effect. The school only had two exits and fire blocked the front door. Children rushed to the rear door, but, in a vestibule narrowed by partitions, they stumbled and climbed on top of one another forming a pile that completely blocked the exit.
Mothers Day was celebrated for the first time in May. In a particularly ugly incident, Springfield, Illinois experienced a race riot. In September at Fort Myer, Virginia, Lieutenant Thomas Selfridge made history by becoming the first person to die in an airplane crash and the pilot, Orville Wright, was severely injured. Ten days later Henry Ford produced his first Model T.
In November, Republican William Howard Taft defeated Democrat William Jennings Bryan for President of the US.
In chess, March 1908 saw the US team defeat the British team in a cable match 6.5-3.5. The US players didn’t lose a game, but the match was won on boards 7, 8 and 9 which produced the only decisive results. Anglo-American cable matches
At Prague, Oldrich Duras and Carl Schlechter tied for first, edging out Dr. Milan Vidmar by a half point. And in Vienna the same two players tied with Geza Maroczy for first. It was at Vienna that Richard Reti made his international debut...he finished in last (20th) place with no wins, 16 losses and three draws!
The big news was Lasker was playing his second match for the World Champiohship; this time his opponent was Dr. Siegbert Tarrasch. Their match might have taken place earlier than 1908 but for technical difficulties, not the least of which was their personal animosity towards each other.
Many felt Tarrasch was every bit Lasker’s equal even if he was six years older. Tarrasch’s tournament record was superior to Lasker’s. When the match was played Tarrasch had won seven big tournaments: Breslau 1889, Manchester 1890, Dresden 1892, Leipzig 1894, Vienna 1898, Monte Carlo 1903 and Ostend 1907.
The match result must have been a bitter disappointment for Tarrasch and his supporters.
Tarrasch sometimes put quality above results when he opted for scientific accuracy rather than brilliancy.
Like almost all players of his era he was influenced by Steinitz and he attempted to improve on Steinitz’ ideas, especially the importance of rapidly developing pieces.
Tarrasch was a model of logic, but he had a weakness when the game left the well beaten paths he was familiar with. A weakness opponents like Lasker, Alekhine and Nimzovich were quick to take advantage of.
Tarrasch was a brilliant writer and his teachings on the middlegame are well known. Less well known are his insights on Rook and Pawn endings. In fact, much of the improvement in the level of play in his day was a direct result of his teaching.
Tarrasch also contributed greatly to opening theory, but that was also one of his weaknesses. He was often too stubborn to change his mind once he had made a decision on the value of a variation even if practice proved it inferior. He especially failed to grasp the ideas behind the new opening theory being put forth by Nimzovich, Tartakower and Reti.
Personality-wise, he had a reputation for a tendency to be easily angered and was known for his strong likes and dislikes, among the latter, Lasker. Even so, he always expressed appreciation for Lasker’s play, it not the man. Later on life he mellowed a bit and was in great demand as a tournament director.
The match was split between Dusseldorf and Munich and the first to win eight games was the victor. In the early part of the match it seemed like Tarrasch might actually have a chance, but he seemed demoralized after the fifth game when his carefully prepared defense to the Ruy Lopez failed to bring success. Tarrasch put up stiff resistance in the remaining games, but Lasker always prevailed. All in all, the games were of a very high quality and a good example of “classic” chess. Lasker won +8 -3 =5. .
[Event "World Champ Match"]
[Site "Duesseldorf GER"]
[Date "1908.8.19"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Siegbert Tarrasch"]
[Black "Emanuel Lasker"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteELO "?"]
[BlackELO "?"]
%Created by Caissa's Web PGN Editor
{C66: Ruy Lopez: Steinitz Defense} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O d6 {
A psychological surprise for Tarrasch. In his match against Steinitz, Lasker
enjoyed considerable success against this defense and had a low opinion of it.
Yet here he is playing it.} 5. d4 Bd7 6. Nc3 Be7 7. Re1 {There are two
Tarrasch Traps in the Ruy Lopez that Tarrasch actually sprung against masters
in tournament games. One is in the Open Variation ( 5.0-0 Nxe4) and the other
is here. If 7...O-O 8.Bxc6 Bxc6 9.dxe5 dxe5 10.Qxd8 and 11.Nxe5 winning a P.}
7... exd4 {Best. 7...Nxd4 has been tried but it has not enjoyed any great
success.} 8. Nxd4 O-O 9. Nxc6 {More usual is 9.Bxc6, but it goes against
Tarrasch's principles. He called gaining a B for a N winning the minor
exchange, so here he would never surrender his B for a N, losing the minor
exchange.} 9... Bxc6 {This not considered so good because eventually white
will be able to play his N to f5. So for that reason 9...bxc6 is better. In
addition, black can use the b-file.} 10. Bxc6 bxc6 11. Ne2 {Heading for f5.
Black can't play 11...Nxe4?? because after 12.Nd4 because the threat of Nxc6
will cost him a piece...his best bet is 12...Nxf2 netting two Ps for the N.}
11... Qd7 12. Ng3 Rfe8 {Lasker intends to play ...Bf8, ...g6 and ...Bg7, but
Tarrasch's excellent reply doen't allow time for that maneuver.} 13. b3 {Now
if 13...Bf8 14.Bb2 Qe6 15. Qf3 white has an excellent position.} 13... Rad8
14. Bb2 {Here is why you have to be careful when using the opening books that
come with chess playing programs. Blindly playing the next "book" move as
given in the Fritz 12 book would result in a blunder because the move is taken
from this game. Black's most reasonable defense is the passive 14...Qe6
followed by ...Bf8, but Lasker chose a different move. Why?} 14... Ng4 {Lasker
observed that in some positions it's impossible to speak of a best move. Out
of several possibilities one move may be best against a particular opponent
even though it may not objectively be the best. Here black has a cramped
position and is facing an attack against his King. It was well known that
Tarrasch was an expert at converting space advantages into a win without
allowing any counter chances. So, Lasker did not want to face Tarrasch with a
cramped and passive position, so he chose a risky line which gives counterplay
at the cost of a P. As the continuation shows he judged his opponent well!}
15. Bxg7 Nxf2 {Tarrasch is faced with two choices: win a P as played or play
for an attack with 16.Qd4 Ng4 17.Nh5 which would have given him a very
promising position. Was Lasker's choice a mistake? Not at all. He knew
Tarrasch preferred clear continuations raher than indulge in complications
that couldn't be calculated.} 16. Kxf2 {Tarrasch is true to his style and goes
for the clear win of a P.} 16... Kxg7 17. Nf5+ Kh8 18. Qd4+ f6 19. Qxa7 Bf8
{The threat is 20...Rxe4 and 21...Qxf5+} 20. Qd4 Re5 {For the P black exerts
strong pressure on the e-file and the isolated P and so has good chances.}
21. Rad1 {A routine move but it doesn't help his situation much. By this time
the position of white's N on f5 has diminished in value because it's support
can be undermined.} 21... Rde8 22. Qc3 Qf7 {After his next unfortunate retreat
white's game goes downhill fast. Tarrasch probably didn't like 23.Qxc6 Rc5
followed by Rxc2+ because while it's OK for white, it offers black some play
and sitting at the board the consequences could be unclear. A solid line that
keeps tha advantage for white would be 23.Qf3 followed by g2-g4.} 23. Ng3 Bh6
{This allows white to keep the advantage. Better was 23...Rc5} 24. Qf3 d5
{Oddly nobody seems to have commented on white's next move. With 25.Nf5 white
can gain the advantage as after 25...dxe4 26.Nxh6 Qg6 27.Qe3 Rh5 28.Rd7
black's positioin is riddled with weaknesses.} 25. exd5 Be3+ 26. Kf1 cxd5 27.
Rd3 Qe6 28. Re2 f5 {White's slip on move 25 has left him on the defensive.}
29. Rd1 f4 30. Nh1 d4 31. Nf2 Qa6 {Threatening 32...Bf2. White's best chance
is to get his K out of the pins by playing it over to h1 and then playing
Nd3.} 32. Nd3 Rg5 33. Ra1 {Even after 33.a4 Qh6 white's position remains
critical. However, with 33.Rde1! he could have eliminated all danger arising
from 33... Qh6 which would be met by 34.Nxf4 Qh2 35.Rxe3!! and white is right
back in the game. After 33.Rde1!! black has to rethink his strategy and play
33.c5 after which he maintains the advantage.} 33... Qh6 34. Ke1 {Of course
not 34.h3 Rg3} 34... Qxh2 35. Kd1 Qg1+ 36. Ne1 Rge5 37. Qc6 R5e6 38. Qxc7
{Chernev makes no comment about Lasker's next move which is a serious mistake
that should have allowed Tarrasch to equalize! Winning is 38...f3. The point
of this move is to return the Q to g6, play the B to f2 and then the Q gains
access to the e-file with devastating consequences.} 38... R8e7 39. Qd8+
{Wrong square! By checking on c8 the Q would be attacking the R on e6 and
hindered black's attack so he would have had to find a different way of
continuing the attack.} 39... Kg7 40. a4 { This is nothing more than a
gesture.} 40... f3 41. gxf3 Bg5 {Now it's clear that if the white Q was on c8
this move would not be possible.} 0-1
No comments:
Post a Comment