Tailenders Tussle

 

    No matter what the tournament some players’ games never get any attention. Unless they get pummeled by one of the leaders those who finish near the bottom never get any recognition. So, just out of curiosity here is a game from the 1957/58 championship that was played by a couple of the tailenders. In this game Attilio Di Camillo (1917-1962) lost to Abe Turner. 

    Di Camillo won the Pennsylvania State Champion in 1946, 1947, 1960 and 1961. He is probably best remembered for being the coach of the U.S. women’s champion and media darling Lisa Lane, 

    Abe Turner (1924-1962, 38 years old) was born in New York City and learned to play chess in 1943 at a naval hospital while recovering from shrapnel wounds he received during World War II. Turner was a strong coffeehouse player who liked to grab a Pawn and then trade down to the ending. For a brief time Fischer was a student of Turner. 

    Noted for his huge girth, Turner was found stabbed to death and stuffed in a safe in the basement of Al Horowitz’ Chess Review magazine offices where he had been working as a clerk. The New York Times reported that in addition to having been stabbed his head had also been battered by a heavy object, probably a claw hammer.

    The building’s superintendent discovered the body while searching the building after Turner’s co-workers began wondering where he was after he had gone down to the basement to dump some trash and didn’t return. 

    Theodore W. Smith, a clerk-typist employed by Chess Review, was arrested while entering his room in the YMCA and readily admitted that he had killed Turn and then dragged his body along a corridor and stuffed it in the safe. Smith claimed that Secret Service agents had told him to kill Turner. 

 

[Event "1957/58 US Champ, New York957/58"] [Site ""] [Date "1958.??.??"] [Round "10"] [White "Attilio Di Camillo"] [Black "Abe Turner"] [Result "*"] [ECO "C98"] [WhiteElo "2367"] [BlackElo "2394"] [Annotator "Stockfish 19"] [PlyCount "85"] [EventDate "1957.12.17"] [SourceVersionDate "2026.10.27"] {C98: Closed Ruy Lopez: Chigorin Defense} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 Na5 9. Bc2 c5 10. d4 Qc7 11. h3 O-O 12. Nbd2 Nc6 13. dxc5 dxc5 14. Nf1 Bd6 15. Bg5 {This has all been played many times. Black's two main choices are 15...Nd7 and 15...Nd8} Nd7 (15... Ne8 16. a4 Rb8 17. axb5 axb5 18. Ne3 f6 19. Nd5 Qf7 {equal. Smyslov,V (2620)-Bolbochan,J Moscow 1956}) 16. Ne3 Nb6 17. Nd5 {A better plam was play on the Q-side with 17.a4} Nxd5 {This is probrbly not a food idea because it gives white's light squared B a clear diagonal to black's K. 17...Na5 immediately was better.} 18. exd5 Na5 19. Nh4 {White's pieces look menacing, but black's position is inherently sound so he should be able to successfully defend his K.} f5 {This is a bit loosening, but 19...f6 leads to unclear play.} (19... f6 20. Qb1 {This leads to some sharp tactical play after} fxg5 21. Bxh7+ $3 {Otherwise white is just a piece down.} Kh8 22. Ng6+ Kxh7 23. Nxf8+ Kg8 24. Nh7 {White has a R+P vs two Bs and the position is unclear.}) 20. g4 $1 fxg4 21. hxg4 (21. Qd3 {was an equally good alternative. The best line is} g6 22. Bh6 Rf7 23. hxg4 Bxg4 24. Qg3 Qd7 25. Re4 Bh5 26. Rae1 {The problem for white here is that there seems to be no way of persuing the attack.}) 21... g6 22. Be4 {This is too passive. The aggressive continuation 22.Bh6 and 23.f4 was more promising.} ({White should try} 22. Bh6 $16) 22... Qf7 23. f3 {Di Camillo has shifted gears ans gone from aggressive play to taking a passive stance.} Bd7 24. b3 Nb7 25. Qd2 {Holding up black's coming Q-side play with 25.c4! would have been considerably better.} a5 {At last black has time to start his counterplay.} 26. a3 Rfc8 {26...a4 was more forceful.} 27. Kg2 {Hoping to build up an attack on the h-file.} c4 28. b4 Ra6 $1 29. Rh1 {And now Nxg6! would win so black has to make tghe defensive move 29...Bf8. Hiwever, both sides are oblivious to the possibility.} Rca8 $2 30. Rac1 $2 (30. Nxg6 hxg6 31. Rh4 {White is going to double Rs on the h-file.} Bf8 32. Rah1 Bg7 33. Kg3 {Intending Qh2 and the tripled heavy pieces on the h-file spell disaster for black.}) 30... Be8 {[%mdl 8192] Again ...Bf8 was necessary.} 31. Kg3 {Again missing Nxg6} axb4 32. axb4 Bf8 {Finally!} 33. Rh2 {Obviously played with the intent pf doub;ing Rs, but by now this idea takes too much time.} (33. Nxg6 {This idea still works, but it 's no longer deadly.} Rxg6 34. Bxg6 Qxg6 35. Bh6 Nd6 36. Bxf8 Kxf8 37. Qh6+ Qxh6 38. Rxh6 Bg6 {White has a R+P vs B+N and the game's outcome is uncertain.}) 33... Nd6 34. Rch1 Bg7 35. Rc1 {More passive play on white's part and this time it gets him into serious difficulties.} (35. Ng2 Ra2 36. Qe3 h5 37. gxh5 Nf5+ 38. Bxf5 gxf5 39. f4 {with unclear complications in which both sides have chances.}) 35... Ra3 36. Ng2 Bd7 37. Ne3 {Trapping his own B, but there was nothing that was really better.} (37. Rch1 {has lost its punch.} h5 38. gxh5 Nf5+ 39. Bxf5 gxf5 40. h6 f4+ 41. Kf2 Ra2 {wins}) 37... h6 38. Rxh6 Bxh6 39. Bxh6 Ra2 40. Nc2 {[%mdl 8192] This is a gross blunder, but it's possible that Di Ca,illo was in time pressure otherwise he could still have made Turner work for the point by retreating the b.} (40. Bc2 Qh7 41. Ng2 {Bkack is better having a R vs. B+P and an active position,, but he also has some clever, but hard to see, tactics available.} Bxg4 42. fxg4 Rxc2 43. Qxc2 Qxh6 {Material is reduced and equal, but black is still attacking.} 44. Re1 Qg5 45. Nh4 Kg7 46. Qxg6+ Qxg6 47. Nxg6 Kxg6 48. Rxe5 Rf8 {Technically black is winning, but in practice the putcome would not be clear.}) 40... Nxe4+ {Black is winning.} 41. fxe4 R8a6 {Intending 41...Rf6} 42. Bg5 {Preventing ...Rf6, but black has...} Rb2 43. Qh2 {In this hopeless position white exceeded the time limit.} (43. Qh2 {A possible continuation is} Raa2 44. Be3 Qf6 45. Rh1 Qg7 46. Rc1 g5 {Now black has defended afaonst an invasion by white's Q and his own Q can now enter the action on the f-file or h-file.} 47. Qg2 Qf6 48. Qh2 Rb3 49. Qe2 Qh6 50. Qd2 Qh4+ 51. Kg2 Qxg4+ {and black is winning.}) *

An Early Fischer Game

    The leading candidate for the 1957/58 U.S. Championship was Samuel Reshevsky and Larry Evans was the dark horse. Robert Byrne would have been in the running, but he had declined his invitation at the last minute. It came as a surprise when Bobby Fischer won his first Championship which concluded on January 7, 1958. 

     The 14-year old Fischer had been playing a lot, giving simultaneous exhibitions and generally attracting attention plus he had won the 1957 U.S. Open and he had lost a two game match against former World Champion Max Euwe. Even so, winning the U.S. Championship looked impossible. 

    His opponent in this game was James T. Sherwin (born 1933) who was having one of his best tournaments ever. Sherwion was awarded the IM title in 1958. An attorney by profession, he was serving as an executive with the GAF Corporation, North America's largest roofing and waterproofing manufacturer, when in 1988 he was indicted for stock manipulation by a sleazy District Attorney, later politician, who hounded Sherwin until finally, on the third try, he managed to get a conviction.

    However, on appeal the conviction was overturned and the case was dismissed with prejudice, meaning the lawsuit was permanently closed and Sherwin cannot be tried for the same case again. Sherwin has lived in England since at least the 2010s.

 

 

[Event "1957/58 U.S. Champ, New York"] [Site "+"] [Date "1957.12.27"] [Round "?"] [White "Robert Fischer"] [Black "James Sherwin"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "B87"] [Annotator "Stockfish 19"] [PlyCount "71"] [EventDate "1957.12.17"] {Sicilian, Sozin Attack} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Bc4 e6 7. O-O {This line was a Fischer favorite.} b5 8. Bb3 b4 {Sherwin probably suspected Fischer had some prepared analysis in the event he played the usual 8...Be2. In any case, it would have been safer that the text which is somewhat weakening and therefore quite risky.} 9. Nb1 Bd7 {Taking the P is technocally safe, but with only his N developed and precariously sitting in the center, Sherwin elects not to risk it.} 10. Be3 {Again, offering the P.} Nc6 {Again, Sherwin declines.} 11. f3 {Because it's clear his opponent isn't going to take the P Fischer decides to protect it and move on to another plan...Q-side play.} Be7 12. c3 bxc3 13. Nxc6 {Tempting Sherwin to play 13...cxb2 which would lose.} Bxc6 14. Nxc3 O-O 15. Rc1 Qb8 16. Nd5 exd5 17. Rxc6 dxe4 18. fxe4 Qb5 {This time taking the e-Pawn would lose, but instead of the text move black could have maintained equality with 18...Qb7!} 19. Rb6 Qe5 20. Bd4 Qg5 21. Qf3 Nd7 22. Rb7 Ne5 23. Qe2 Bf6 24. Kh1 a5 {This P is a serious weakness and it soon falls, but in the process Fischer missed a better continuation.} 25. Bd5 Rac8 26. Bc3 a4 {Here Fischer should have played 27.h3, not to prevent black's next move (which is a poor one), but to eliminate any danger of ending up with a first rank weakness which cpuld show up in some variations.} 27. Ra7 Ng4 {This should have lost outright!} 28. Rxa4 {An interesting position! A cursory glance at the position might give the impression that white is winning, but, in fact, black gets fully equal chances. One annotator who was present at the game noted that it took Fischer less than a minute to capture the P and he wasted no time in rejecting 28.Bxf6. Alas, both Fischer ant the annotator were wrong because after either 28.Bxf6 or 28.Rxa4 black can equalize.} (28. Bxf6 Nxf6 29. Rxa4 Rc1 {and black has equalized.}) (28. Bd2 {This mild mannered retreat is actually white's best reply as it allows white to bring the B into a dominating position after} Qg6 29. h3 Ne5 30. Bf4 {and now white is ready to capture the a-Pawn with impunity.}) 28... Bxc3 {Things are about to get tactical.} 29. bxc3 Rxc3 30. Rxf7 {This is not nearly so devsatating as it looks.} Rc1+ {A clever tactical trap, but Fischer is alert.} (30... h5 $3 {While not at all flashy or tricky, this move keeps the chances even.} 31. Rc4 Rxc4 32. Rxf8+ Kxf8 33. Qxc4 {White has every advantahe. An outside passed P and a B vs. N, yet with carful play squeezong out a win will be difficult, if not impossible. (engine evluation 0.00).}) 31. Qf1 (31. Rf1+ $4 {A tactical blunder that loses outright after.} Kh8 32. Ra8 Rxa8 33. Bxa8 Qf4 34. g3 Rxf1+ 35. Kg2 Rf2+) 31... h5 32. Qxc1 Qh4 (32... Qxc1+ 33. Rf1+ Kh8 34. Rxc1 {leaves white a R to the good.}) 33. Rxf8+ Kh7 34. h3 Qg3 35. hxg4 h4 36. Be6 {Black resigned. A real fighting game.} 1-0

Who Were Fritz Woog and Leonhard Westphal?

    An Internet search for these German masters won't turn up much. According to Edo Historical Ratings Fritz Woog's first rating was 2247 in 1920 and his last rating was 2130 in 1929...all based on a scant 83 games. In group 4 of the 1920 German Championship he finished second behind Carl Ahues with a score of +4 -1 =2, 

    His one loss being to Ahues. Chessgames.com has only three of Woog's games and five by Westphal. The only information on Westphal is that he was born August 16, 1895 and died at the age of 61 on March 6, 1957. 

    The below game between these two is both entertaining and instructive. It’s a good example of short range planning plus it features a Classic Bishop Sacrifice that does not lead to an immediate forced win. Also, Woog's methodical buildup of his attack is instructive to witness. Analysis by Fritz/Stockfish evaluates Woog’s play as “very precise.” 

 

[Event "Berlin Open"] [Site ""] [Date "1920.??.??"] [Round ""] [White "Fritz Woog"] [Black "Leonhard Westphal"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C83"] [Annotator "Stockfish 19"] [PlyCount "67"] [EventDate "1920.??.??"] {C83: Open Ruy Lopez} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Nxe4 {White will argue that black loosens his position with this active defense while black hopes to deprive white of a center P. Black's K will be temporarily vulnerable, but can reach safety while white is busy regaining his P.} 6. d4 {Other moves are not worth considering.} b5 7. Bb3 d5 8. dxe5 Be6 {At this point white has tried many different moves with varying degrees of success, but the text is by far the most often seen.} 9. c3 Be7 10. Be3 O-O 11. Nbd2 Nc5 {The main line 11...Qd7 is much better. The move played has not yielded good results for black.} 12. Bc2 Bg4 {Another poor choice. 12...Qd7 is still the move.} 13. h3 Bh5 (13... Bxf3 {also favors white.} 14. Nxf3 Re8 15. b4 Ne4 16. Qb1 Qd7 17. Bxe4 dxe4 18. Qxe4 {White is better.}) 14. Bxh7+ {After this black should simply acquiesce to the loss of a P and play 14...Kh8. Instead, he accepts the B and loses.} Kxh7 (14... Kh8 15. g4 Bxg4 $2 {Now is the to play 15...Kxh7} 16. hxg4 Kxh7 17. Bxc5 Bxc5 18. Nb3 Bb6 {White is winning. Miletic,D-Ursic,M (2078) Nova Gorica 2002}) 15. Ng5+ {[%mdl 512] In the classic Bishop sacrifice it is essential for white to be able to play this move.} Bxg5 16. Qxh5+ Bh6 17. Bxc5 Re8 18. f4 ({Less strong is} 18. Qxf7 Nxe5 19. Qf5+ g6 {White is better, but his attack is at a standstill.}) 18... g6 19. Qf3 Qd7 20. Rad1 Nd8 21. Nb3 {The N is headed for the outpost on d4. Note that this type of "plan" is only two moves and there is no particular target, but it is the type of short plan that is often seen in master practice. If you can't think of anything to do, find a poorly positioned piece and think of a way to improve its position. 21...c6 22.♘d4 ♘b7 23.♘b3 This retreat is less effective than simply playing 23.Bb6. From d4 the N could think about going on a further journey of c2, e3 and g4 from where it eyes f6. 23...a5 24.♗d4 ♕f5 It's hard to suggest a really viable plan for black, but this move simply loses time as white plays g4 with a gain of time. 25.g4 ♕c8 26.♘c5 While this doesn't really harm white's position, an immediate attack with 26.f5 would have been more forceful.} c6 22. Nd4 {Threatens to win with f5.} Nb7 23. Nb3 a5 {Eliminating the B with 23...Nxc5 was just a bit better.} 24. Bd4 Qf5 25. g4 Qc8 26. Nc5 Nd8 {Hoping to exchange some attackers with 26...Nxc5 would not be of much help.} 27. Qg3 Bg7 28. f5 {[%mdl 32]} g5 29. h4 {Woog concludes the attack with great verve.} gxh4 30. Qxh4+ Kg8 31. f6 Bh8 32. Rf5 Ne6 33. Nxe6 fxe6 34. f7+ {Black resigned. Forceful and precise play by Woog.} 1-0

How Is This Position Legal?

    When I saw this position in a post on Tim Krabbe’s old online site it just had to be checked out. How can this position possibly be legal?! You can read about it HERE; it’s post #373.

    Tim Krabbe was born on April 13, 1943, in Amsterdam and is a renowned author and cyclist who is best known in the chess world for his long running online site Chess Curiosities, which explores endgame studies and historical chess curiosities of every kind.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

[Event ""] [Site ""] [Date "???.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Puzzle"] [Black "?"] [Result "*"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "65"] [EventDate "1898.??.??"] [SourceVersionDate "2026.10.22"] 1. d3 h6 2. Bxh6 f5 3. Qd2 f4 4. Qxf4 a5 5. Qxc7 Kf7 {The K is headed for a1.} 6. g3 Kg6 7. Bg2 Kh5 8. Bxb7 Kg4 9. Nf3 Kh3 10. Bxc8 e5 11. Bxg7 e4 12. Kd2 e3+ 13. Kxe3 Kg2 14. Ng1 Kf1 15. Kf3 Ke1 16. Qxa5+ Bb4 17. Nc3+ Kd2 18. Rf1 Rh3 19. Bxd7 Nh6 20. Nd1 Kc1 21. Bxh6+ Kb1 {The white pieces gragually begin heading home.} 22. Bc1 Na6 23. Kg2 Rc8 24. Bxh3 Rc3 25. Nxc3+ Ka1 26. Nb1 Nc5 27. Rd1 Be1 28. Qxe1 Ne4 29. Kf1 Nd2+ 30. Rxd2 Qd5 31. Qd1 Qg2+ 32. Ke1 Qf1+ 33. Bxf1 {It's mate in 3.} (33. Bxf1 Kxb1 34. c4 Ka1 (34... Kxa2 35. b3+ Ka1 36. Ba3#) 35. b4 Kb1 36. Ba3#) (33. Bxf1 Kxa2 34. b4 Kxb1 (34... Ka1 35. c4 Kxb1 36. Ba3#) 35. c4 Ka1 36. Ba3#) *

A Strong Knight in the Center

    Knights make excellent in blockaders, but because their range is limited they are best used in this capacity in or near the center. A Knight occupying such an outpost often gives rise to interesting and instructive play. 

    In the following game Boleslavsky sacrifices a Pawn in order to maneuver his Knight into a blockading position that is so strong it leads to winning the game. 

    Isaac Boleslavsky (191901977) learned to play chess at the age of nine, but it was not until after World War II that he first made a name for himself and in the 1950s he was one of the leading Soviet players. He died in Minsk at age 57 after a fall on an icy sidewalk. He suffered a fractured hip and could not overcome an infection acquired during his hospitalization. Georgy Lisitsin (1909-1972) was was Leningrad Champion in 1933-34 (jointly), 1939 and 1947 (jointly) and was awarded the IM title at its inception in 1950. 

 

[Event "USSR Champ, Leningrad"] [Site ""] [Date "1956.02.01"] [Round "?"] [White "Isaac Boleslavsky"] [Black "Georgy Lisitsin"] [Result "1-0"] [Annotator "Stockfish 19"] [ECO "B76"] [WhiteFideId "-1"] [BlackFideId "-1"] [PlyCount "59"] [GameId "2367641511301139"] [EventDate "1956.??.??"] {B76: Sicilian Dragon} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 O-O 8. Qd2 Nc6 9. O-O-O Nxd4 {With this move black enters a line that has not enjoyed much success. Better wpuld have been 9...d5} (9... d5 10. exd5 Nxd5 11. Nxc6 bxc6 12. Bd4 e5 {But even here although the position is technically equal, in practical play white has enjoyed considerable success.}) 10. Bxd4 Qa5 {A poor choice. Much better would have been 10...Be6} 11. Kb1 (11. Bc4 {is the thematic move, but it can safely be met by} Be6 {Capturing the B only strengthems black's center, so...} 12. Bb3 b5 {with good play.}) 11... e5 (11... Be6 {is often met with the incorrect 12.g4 which allows black to get good play. Much better for white is} 12. Nd5 Qd8 (12... Qxd2 13. Nxe7+ {and white is practically winning}) 13. h4 h6 14. g4 {White has a very dangerous attack brewing.}) 12. Be3 Be6 {Inhibits Bc4.} 13. a3 ({Stronger than} 13. Qxd6 Bxa2+ 14. Nxa2 Rfd8 {forcing} 15. Qxd8+ Rxd8 16. Bc4 {and white only has a R+B for his Q.}) 13... Rfd8 {Black's plan is to prepare the advance ...d5.} (13... a6 {Black apparently thought he was setting a trap in Matsuura,E (2460)-Assumpcao,R (2305) Sao Paulo 2006 when he played this, but...} 14. Qxd6 {and white found the refutation.} Rfd8 15. Bb6 Rxd6 16. Bxa5 Rc6 {White has won the P cleanly and eventually won the game.}) 14. Nb5 {A clever retort. Black can't afford to trade Qs and there is no really good square to which the Q can retreat.} Qa4 {After the previous error 14 . , Q x Q; 15 Rx Q is no longer sufficient, since both 16 Rtx QP and 16 Kt—B7 are threatened.} (14... Qxd2 15. Rxd2 d5 16. Nc7 Rac8 17. Nxe6 fxe6 18. Bxa7 dxe4 19. Rxd8+ Rxd8 20. fxe4 Nxe4 21. Be2 {The ending is greatly in white's favor.}) 15. c4 {This surprising P sacrifice allows white to force the exchange of both the black pieces that cover the important strategic square d5. It's interesting strategy that was praised by GM Ludek Pachman in one of his otherwise excellent book, but it misses the crusher.} (15. Nc7 {Attacking the R and threatening Bb5.} Qc6 16. Nxa8 d5 17. Bb5 Qxb5 18. Nc7 Qc6 19. Nxe6 Qxe6 20. exd5 Rxd5 21. Qe2 {1-0 Alonso,S (2500)-Campeon,M (2020) Villa Tehuelches CHI 2019}) 15... Bxc4 {[If black declines the P offer he will still end up with a vastly inferior position.} (15... Rac8 16. Qc2 Qxc2+ 17. Kxc2 Bxc4 18. Bxc4 Rxc4+ 19. Kb3 Rc6 20. Nxa7 Ra6 (20... Rc7 21. Bb6) 21. Nb5 d5 22. exd5 Nxd5 23. Rd3 {White's position is vastly superior.}) 16. Nc3 Qb3 17. Bxc4 Qxc4 18. Bg5 Qe6 19. Bxf6 {gaining complete control of d5.} Qxf6 20. Nd5 Qh4 {The result of white's 15.c4 is that he is left with a strong N in the center and black has a bad B. Black's extra P on d6 is actually a disadvantage, because it hinders black's pieces. White's next plan is to prepare the opening of files on the K-side for an attack on black's K.} 21. Qe2 {[%mdl 1024] White has strong compensation.} Bf8 {Were it not for the pawn at (23, the Bishop could come into play this way!} 22. Qf1 $1 (22. g3 {at once would be wrong because after} Qh3 {the advance of the white Ps is held up.}) 22... Rac8 23. g3 {[%mdl 32]} Qg5 24. h4 Qh6 {Capturing the g-Pawn loses the Q.} (24... Qxg3 25. Rh3 (25. Rd2 {Curiously, in Modern Chess Tactics Pachman claimed this move wins the Q after ...Rg2, it does not. Still, after} Bh6 26. Rg2 $4 (26. Rd1 $1 {wins after 27.Rh3}) 26... Rc1+ {black has equalized.}) 25... Qxh3 26. Qxh3) 25. g4 {Threatening the winning advance of the g- and h-Pawns.} g5 26. hxg5 Qxg5 27. Rh5 Qg6 28. g5 {The decisive move. Black has no defense.} h6 29. Rxh6 $1 {[%mdl 512]} Qxg5 (29... Bxh6 30. Ne7+) 30. Rh5 $3 {[%mdl 512] Black resigned. Except for the tactical hiccup on move 15 this game is an excellent example of strategic play.} (30. Rh5 Qxh5 31. Nf6+ Kh8 32. Nxh5) 1-0

A Classic Stonewall Attack

    As I wrote in a post a few years ago, I am tempted to say winning with the Stonewall Attack can’t be done, but that’s because I tried it a few times and it never worked out like a couple of my books on it said it was supposed to. Indeed, the opening does not enjoy a good reputation today, but it might still be worth a try; it’s just not for me. 

    What it is supposed to do is build a wall of Pawns on the dark squares and white will then use his Queen, King’s Bishop anf Knight to launch an attack. The following game is a classic example of the Stonewall in action. White’s attack is simply brilliant.

    The winner, Dr. Richard Kujoth (1931-2011, 80 years old), was Wisconsin Champion in 1947, 1948, 1949, 1952, 1953, and 1958. His opponent, Dt. Charles Crittenden (1933-2023, 90 years old) was a National Master who won the championship of North Carolina in 1948, 1952, 1953, 1956 and 1959. 

 

 

[Event "Milwaukee"] [Site ""] [Date "1949.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Richard Kujoth"] [Black "Charles C Crittenden"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "D00"] [Annotator "Stockfish 19"] [PlyCount "41"] [EventDate "1949.??.??"] {D00: Stonewall Attack} 1. d4 d5 2. e3 Nf6 (2... Bf5 {The idea of this move is to trade off the light squared Bs. GM Andy Soltis explains that the move is weak because it weakens the b7 square and white often get favorable tactical opportunities on the a4-e7 diagonal} 3. Nf3 {White does well to abandon the Stonewall here.} Nf6 4. c4 c6 5. Nc3 {White is just slightly better.}) (2... Bf5 3. Bd3 {This attempt to use the ensuing gob of Ps in the center leads to no more than equality.} Bxd3 4. cxd3 Nf6 5. Qb3 b6 6. Nf3 e6 7. Nc3 c5 {with full equalit5y.}) 3. Bd3 e6 {Routine. 3...g6 and 4...Bg7 is probably his best plan. This, together with ...c5, effectively nullifies the pressure of white's B on d3.} 4. f4 (4. Nd2 {Preventing black from playing ...ne5 would have been more accurate.} c5 5. c3 Nc6 6. f4 {etc.}) 4... Nbd7 (4... Ne4 {The thematic move.} 5. Nf3 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nbd2 f5 {is completely equal. It's pretty clear any hopes white had of generating a K-side attack have been stymied.}) 5. Nd2 c5 (5... b6 6. Ngf3 Bb7 7. O-O Ne4 8. Ne5 Nxe5 9. fxe5 Qd7 {White's position is the more active. Petricevic,P (2019)-Dobrovic,A (2091) Sibenik CRO 2012}) 6. c3 {So that in the event of ...c4 he can jeep the B on the diagonal with Bc2.} cxd4 $146 {Relieving the center tension is a poot choice. 6...Bd6 and castling was the correct way to go.} (6... c4 7. Bc2 b5 8. a3 a5 9. Qe2 Bb7 10. Ngf3 b4 11. axb4 axb4 12. Rxa8 Qxa8 {is equal. Ivanov,D (2071)-Slavov,V Sofia 2007}) 7. exd4 Be7 8. Ngf3 {Here white is only slightly better, but black's problem is that the smallest slip will allow white a winning attack.} b6 {Castling was better.} 9. Ne5 {Here again black should castle. Instead, he plays a move that allows white to begin a strong attack.} Nxe5 {This eliminates white's well placed N, but it has the disadvantage of opening thr f-file and allowing white's B on c1 into the game. his best option was to castle and then play ...a5 and ...Ba6 hoping white will allow the exchange of Bs.} 10. fxe5 Nd7 11. O-O a5 (11... O-O {is no better. White has no direct mating attack, but black's position would still be very poor.} 12. Qh5 g6 13. Qe2 Bg5 14. Nf3 Bxc1 15. Raxc1 Qe7 16. Rce1 Bb7 {Black's pieces are all very ineffective whereas white can now launch a promising attack beginning with 17.h4!}) (11... f5 {is met by} 12. g4 {Black has no good answer to this, If} O-O 13. gxf5 exf5 14. Bxf5 Nb8 {An attempt to easee the defense by trading pieces.} 15. Bd3 {White needs to preserve this B.} Na6 16. Rxf8+ Qxf8 17. Qf3 Qxf3 18. Nxf3 {and white has a distinct endgame advantage.}) 12. Qg4 g6 13. Bc2 {[%mdl 128] This avoids the exchange of this valuable B which otherwise would happen after ...Ba6.} Bg5 $2 {The idea is to trade some pieces, but it allows white a nice little tactical response.} (13... f5 {keeps fighting.} 14. exf6 Nxf6 15. Ba4+ {The weakness on the a4-e8 diagonal that Solti mentioned.} Kf7 16. Qh4 {After white adds his N to the attack with Nf3 black will face serious difficulties.}) 14. Nc4 $1 {[%mdl 512]} dxc4 {He can't allow the N to reach d6.} (14... Bxc1 {14...Be7 4.24 gets him mated.} 15. Nd6+ Kf8 16. Qxe6 {[%csl Gd6,Gf1][%cal Re6f7]} Be3+ 17. Kh1 {[%csl Gd6,Gf1][%cal Re6f7]} Nxe5 18. Rxf7+ Kg8 19. Rd7+ Kf8 20. Rf1+ Bf2 21. Rxf2+ Nf7 22. Qxf7#) 15. Bxg5 Qc7 {White now has a crushing finish, bit there was no way to save the game/} 16. Rxf7 $3 {[%mdl 512] Brilliant.} Kxf7 17. Rf1+ {White has a mating attack.} Kg7 18. Bh6+ $1 {[%mdl 512] Another brilliant move!} Kxh6 19. Rf7 Qd8 20. Rxh7+ $3 {[%mdl 512] Yet another brilliant move.} Kxh7 (20... Rxh7 21. Qxg6#) 21. Qxg6# {No wonder this is a classic example of the Stonewall Attack in action.} 1-0

Pecise Attacking Play With the Saemisch

    Flavio de Carvalho Jr. (916-1990) who was theBrazilian chess champion in 1952 is no to be confused with the famous 20th-century Brazilian architect and modernist artist with the same name. From the end to 1940s to the early 1960s the chess playing Carvalho was one of the leading Brazilian players. He participated in many Brazilian championships. 

    In 1960 he represented Brazil in World Championship South America Zonal and he participated in several major international tournaments which took place in South America. In 1955-1956 he together with Marcio Elisio Freitas published the chess magazine Xadrez (Chess Chessmetrics estimates his highest rating to have been 2424 in 1956. 

     His opponent in the following game was Washington De Oliveira (1916-1976), the champion of Rio de Janeiro in 1944, 1946, 1949, 1955, 1960, 1968 and 1969. He served as Vice president of the Brazil Chess Federation, and as its president in 1976. He was also the chief organizer of the 1973 Petropolis Interzonal. The game is a good example of precision play byCarvalho using the Saemisch Attack against the King’s Indian. 

 

[Event "Brazilian Championship, Porto Alegre"] [Site "Porto Alegre BRA"] [Date "1947.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Flavio de Carvalho Jr"] [Black "Washingt Oliveira"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "E81"] [Annotator "Stockfish 19"] [PlyCount "71"] [EventDate "1947.??.??"] {E81: King's Indian: Saemisch Variation} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. f3 {The Saemisch was developed in the 1920s. It often leads to very sharp play with the players castling on opposite wings and attacking each other's Kings. Black has a variety of Pawn breaks, such as ...e5, ...c5, and after preparation ...b5.} O-O 6. Be3 h6 {All this does is create a target. After 6...h6 black does not get the slightest hint of counterplay. Better choices were 6...e5, 6...c5 or 6...Nc6} 7. Qd2 Kh7 8. Nge2 Nbd7 9. g4 Ng8 {White is already poised to begin his attack and this move is just too slow because black has no time to waste.} (9... c5 10. Ng3 cxd4 11. Bxd4 Ne5 12. Be2 Bd7 {Here, too, white's position is the more promising. Pasero,P-Gnecco,H Argentina 1936}) 10. Ng3 e5 (10... a5 {was tried in another Pasero,P-Gnecco,H Argentina 1936 game and white also had the advantage.} 11. h4 e6 12. f4 b6 13. f5 Bb7 14. Bg2 c5 15. d5 {White went on to win.}) 11. d5 b6 {A better plan was 11...a5 and 12...Nc5.} 12. h4 a5 13. Bd3 Nc5 14. Bc2 Bd7 15. O-O-O a4 {Just a glance at the position should make it obvious that the only real attacking chances belong to white.} 16. Rdg1 Qe8 17. Rh2 Qe7 18. Qe2 Rfb8 19. Nf5 Qe8 {Black seems to be sitting on his hands waiting for the end, but taking the N would not have been much better.} (19... gxf5 20. exf5 f6 21. Rhg2 Be8 22. Qd2 Qf8 23. g5 {White's attack should prove decisive. Black can hardly afford to take the P;} hxg5 (23... fxg5 24. f6+) 24. hxg5 fxg5 (24... a3 25. Rh2+) 25. f6+ Bg6 26. Rxg5 Nxf6 27. Rxg6 e4 28. Qh2+ Kg8 29. Qh6 {wins}) 20. Nxg7 Kxg7 21. f4 exf4 22. Bxf4 Qe7 23. Be3 Rf8 24. Bd4+ {White is clearly winning.} Kh7 25. g5 h5 {This allows a brilliant finish, but there was no way to save the game.} 26. Qxh5+ $3 {[%mdl 512]} gxh5 27. e5+ $1 {[%mdl 32]} Kh8 28. exd6+ Qf6 29. gxf6 (29. Bxf6+ {also wins, but it is not quite as effective.} Nxf6 30. gxf6 Bg4 31. dxc7 Rfe8 32. d6 {and white will wrap it up with Rd2.}) 29... Bg4 30. dxc7 Nd7 {Black plays on out of inertia,} 31. Bxa4 Nh6 32. Bc6 Rac8 33. Bxd7 Bxd7 34. Bxb6 Ng4 35. Re2 Nxf6 36. Bd4 {Black resigned...something he could have done severa; moves back.} 1-0

Real or Fake?

    One of my favorite books is an old one: The Golden Treasury of Chess by Al Horowitz. The book has a controversial history. The man behind the original book was Francis J. Wellmuth (1866-1943), an American chess compiler best known for putting the book together. It was originally published in 1943 and in later editions Horowitz removed Wellmuth’s name from the book. Chess historian Edward Winter discusses the topic on his site HERE. 

    One of the games that caught my eye was a casual game played in Boston in 1892 between the eccentric US Master Franklin K. Young and the mysterious L. Dore. Young occupies a unique niche in the chess world because of his serious effort to reduce chess to a mathematically exact system formulated on the principles of military science. 

    He received some recognition around the late 1800’s and early 1900’s from world champion Emanuel Lasker, who referred to one of his books as "replete with logic and common sense." Today Young's work is treated with ridicule and scorn. 

    L. Dore was probably a member of the club in Boston that included Young and well know players like John F. Barry, C. F. Burille and Preston Ware. The group was the foundation of what would become the Deschapelles Chess Club in Boston. 

    Regarding today’s game...the exact same game was played between Henry Atkins and Herbert L. Jacobs in London in 1915. Edward Winter discussed this controversy in post number 7096 HERE. 

    British player, author and columnist Leonard Barden, posting in an English chess forum, suggested that the Atkins v. Jacobs game was almost certainly fictitious and possibly so is the Young vs. Dore game! 

    Young played the Danish Gambit, an opening in which white sacrifices a Pawn or two for the sake of rapid development and the hope of getting an attack. However, with care black can accept one or both Pawns safely or simply decline the gambit and get good chances. 

     The Danish was popular with old masters like Alekhine, Blackburne and Mieses, but as good defensive lines were discovered for black in the 1920s it disappeared. Marshall used to play it, too, especially in simultaneous exhibitions. He wrote that his opponents eventually got booked up on it so he had to quit playing it. 

    For those not familiar with the gambit, it is highly aggressive and, as one author put it, “quite expensive” in the terms of Pawns. However, it can give rise to hard fought games in which the result is never a foregone conclusion. 

    In this game white's attack was hardly sound and black missed several wins, but it's fun to play over.

 

[Event "Casual Game, Boston Press Club"] [Site ""] [Date "1892.11.08"] [Round ""] [White "Franklin K. Young"] [Black "L. Dore"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C21"] [Annotator "Stockfish 19"] [PlyCount "43"] [EventDate "1892.??.??"] {C21: Danish Gambit} 1. e4 e5 {[%mdl 32]} 2. d4 exd4 {There is really no satisfactory way of declining white's offer. The solid looking 2...d6 has, for whatever reason, given white good results.} 3. c3 {My database has 782 games in which this move was played and the results are about evenly divided between white and black wins with only about a quarter of them drawn. That said, among the more recent (1977 to 2018) games with both players rated over 2400 white hasa disnal result.} dxc3 {If black wants to decline the Pawn he can play 4...d5. Either way he scores well.} 4. Bc4 Nf6 5. Nf3 {While this develops a piece, it's not white's best choice.} (5. e5 {This is not so good either.} d5 6. exf6 dxc4 7. Qxd8+ Kxd8 8. Nxc3 gxf6 9. Bf4 {White has nothing to show for his material deficietr. Porobija,A (2002)-Bosiocic,M, Split 2013}) (5. Nxc3 {Leads to sharp positions where white has reasonable chances of success.} Nc6 6. Nf3 d6 7. Qb3 Qd7 8. Ng5 Ne5 9. Bb5 {Black is only slightly better.}) 5... Nxe4 (5... cxb2 {With car ful play this should prove safe for black.} 6. Bxb2 Nxe4 $2 {runs into} 7. Bxf7+ Kxf7 8. Qd5+ Ke8 9. O-O $1 (9. Qxe4+ Qe7 {is to black's advantage.}) 9... Nf6 10. Re1+ Be7 11. Bxf6 {is winning for white.}) 6. O-O {The threat is 7,Bxf7+} Nd6 {Horrible defense...black blocks his own B and prevents the advance of his own d-Pawn.} (6... Nf6 {is safe. White should mow play 7.Nxc3 with equal chances, but he must not play} 7. Nxc3 (7. Bxf7+ Kxf7 8. Ng5+ Kg8 {The K is safer here than on e8. In either case white has no effective way of conducting an attack.} 9. Nxc3 d5 {and black is up a B and a P.}) 7... Be7 8. Re1 O-O {equals.}) 7. Nxc3 $2 {White is much too optimistic! 7.Bb3 would leave him with an excellent position thanks to black's last move.} Nxc4 8. Re1+ Be7 9. Nd5 Nc6 10. Bg5 f6 $1 (10... Nxb2 {would be a fatal mistake.} 11. Nxe7 Nxd1 12. Nxc6+ Kf8 13. Nxd8 Nc3 14. Be7+ Kg8 15. Bb4 {wins}) 11. Rc1 {Black has two equally good moves here, both of which maintains a huge advantage.} b5 $2 (11... fxg5 12. Rxc4 O-O 13. Rce4 Bf6 14. Qb3 Kh8 {White has a clever trap here!} 15. Nxc7 $3 Qxc7 $4 (15... Be7 $3 {keeps a significant advantage after} 16. Nxa8 d5 17. Rxe7 Nxe7 {White cannot extricate his N.}) 16. Qf7 h6 17. Re8 {ans white wins.}) (11... O-O 12. Rxc4 fxg5 13. Rce4 Bf6 {has transposed into the above position.}) (11... Nxb2 {favors white after} 12. Qb3 Nd3 13. Qxd3 O-O 14. Bf4) 12. Rxc4 $2 (12. Bxf6 {is much better.} gxf6 13. Nh4 O-O {This position is extraordinarily complicated and white has only one move that equalizes} 14. Rxc4 $3 (14. Qg4+ {isn't good enough.} Kh8 15. Ng6+ hxg6 16. Qxg6 N4e5 17. Qh6+ Kg8 {White's lone Q can't accomplish anything.}) 14... f5 15. Nxf5 Rxf5 16. Rg4+ Kf7 17. Qc2 d6 18. Qxc6 Bd7 {An amazing position. White is a piece down, but with all of his pieces in play against black's exposed K the chances are equal!}) 12... bxc4 {White could now capture on f6 with either piece, but neither would not gain him any advantage so he tries another way which should prove equally unsuccessful.} 13. Ne5 {Black has an array of captures, but they all lose. Getting his K to sagety with 13...O-O assures him of a winning advantage.} fxg5 $4 {[%mdl 8192] [This allows a fatal check on h5.} (13... O-O 14. Nxc6 dxc6 15. Nxe7+ Kh8 16. Qxd8 Rxd8 17. Nxc6 Rf8 {Black is the exchange and a P up.}) 14. Qh5+ {There is no answer to this.} g6 15. Nf6+ {[%mdl 512]} Bxf6 16. Nxg6+ Qe7 17. Rxe7+ Bxe7 {This allows a mate in 4, but there was no saving the game.} 18. Ne5+ {[%mdl 32] He mates a move quicker with 18.Nxh8+} Kd8 19. Nf7+ Ke8 20. Nd6+ {[%mdl 64]} Kd8 21. Qe8+ {[%mdl 512]} Rxe8 22. Nf7# 1-0

50 Years Back

    Major world events of 1976 included the Mars Landing that sent back the first color photographs of the Martian surface. The supersonic Concorde launched its first scheduled commercial passenger flights and Apple Computer was founded. 

     In the United States 1976 was defined by the Bicentennial celebrations. Sylvester Stallone burst into superstardom in the smash-hit sports drama Rocky. Hit television shows were Charlie’s Angels, Happy Days, Laverne & Shirley, The Bionic Woman and Welcome Back, Kotter. American figure skater Dorothy Hamill won Olympic gold.

    Few people were aware of it, but Americans Robert Byrne, Lubomir Kavale, Larry Evans, James Tarjan, William Lombardy and Kim Commons also won gold. They won it at the 22nd Chess Olympiad in Haifa, Israel. This Olympiad was marred by a massive boycott by teams from the Soviet Union, Eastern Bloc and Arab nations because it was held in Israel. 

    Chess was dominated by World Champion Anatoly Karpov who had one of the most boring styles ever. A U.S. player won the World Junior Championship in 1976. He was Mark Diesen (1957-2008), whose father Carl Diesen was a well known tournament/correspondence player, earned the iM title for his accomplishment. During his broef career he won the Louisiana State Champion in 1986, 1987 and 1988. He grew up in Potomac, Maryland (a suburb of Washington, D.C.), where he become a student of GM Lubosh Kavalek, who was one of the strongest players in the world at that time. 

    Even though Kavalek was noted for his tactical style, Diesen developed a positional style that made him a difficult opponent and he scored victories over GMs like Larry Evans, Borislav Ivkov, John Nunn and Eugenio Torre. Diesen played in only one U.S. Championship (in 1980), but had to withdraw after three rounds after injuring himself in a fall. 

    He graduated from the University of Tennessee with a degree in chemical engineering and except for some local coaching abandoned chess and began a career as a reservoir engineer for Shell Oil, Pennzoil and Noble Energy. He died in Conroe, Texas of unspecified causes on December 9, 2008; he was 51 years old.

    Here is a good example of his precise positional play. The tournament was a 12-round Swiss with 54 players. Diesen finished first with 10 points. He was followed by Lubomir Ftacnik (9.5) and Nir Grinberg (9.0). 

 

[Event "World Junior Champ., Groningen"] [Site ""] [Date "1976.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Mark Diesen"] [Black "Peter Van Egmond"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C91"] [Annotator "Stockfish 19"] [PlyCount "53"] [EventDate "1976.12.21"] {C91: Closed Ruy Lopez} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 {[%mdl 32]} a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. d4 {Diesen expected that Van Edmond would play his favorite Marshall Counterattack and although he knew some good lines against it he chooses to avoid it,} (8. c3 {is the most common here an the Marshall is} d5 9. exd5 Nxd5 10. Nxe5 Nxe5 11. Rxe5 c6 12. d4 {This is the main line and is most likely to leaf to a draw with best play.}) 8... d6 9. c3 Bg4 10. Be3 exd4 11. cxd4 Na5 12. Bc2 c5 13. Nbd2 cxd4 14. Bxd4 Nc6 15. Be3 d5 {This is the main line and the chances are equal.} 16. h3 Bh5 17. g4 (17. Rc1 {is the main alternative.} Nb4 18. Bb1 dxe4 19. Nxe4 Qxd1 20. Rcxd1 Bxf3 21. gxf3 Nbd5 22. Nxf6+ Nxf6 23. f4 {and Pridorozhni,A (2533)-Bykov,E (2419) Moscow 2022 is completely equal and was eventually drawn.}) 17... dxe4 {The simplest way of equalizing.} (17... d4 {is also equal, but a bit more complicated.} 18. Bg5 d3 19. Bb3 Bg6 20. Rc1 Nd4 {with an active position.}) 18. gxh5 exf3 19. Qxf3 Nb4 {While this is not bad 19,,,Nd4 was more precise because it would have gained the two Bs.} 20. Bb3 {The B is now on an active diagonal.} Nbd5 {More active would have been 20...a5 and 21...Nd3} 21. Bg5 {Worth considering was 21.Nf1 and if 21...Nxe3 22.Nxe3 the N has a potential outpost on f5.} h6 22. Bh4 Re8 $2 {[%mdl 8192] This innocent looking move is tactically faulty.} (22... Ra7 23. Rad1 {The point of the last move, Black is now equal.} Rd7) 23. Rad1 {White has completed his development and black is completely tied up.} Ra7 {Too late!} 24. Ne4 {[%mdl 32] Headed for f5} Rd7 25. Ng3 Nc7 26. Nf5 {White's pieces are poised for the kill. and apparently Van Egmond doesn't suscpect a thing. Of course even if he pays another move that 26...Bb4 he is still lost.} Bb4 {White to play and win.} 27. Nxh6+ $1 {[%mdl 512] Black resigned.} (27. Nxh6+ {White gets a won position in all variations.} Kf8 (27... gxh6 28. Bxf6) 28. Rxe8+ Kxe8 (28... Qxe8 29. Rxd7 Qxd7 30. Nxf7) 29. Rxd7 Qxd7 (29... gxh6) (29... Kxd7 30. Nxf7 Qf8 31. h6 gxh6 32. Qf5+ Kc6 33. Bxf6) 30. Nf5 Nfd5 31. Nxg7+ Kf8 32. Nf5 {White is winning.}) 1-0

Reshevsky at Leeds

 

    Today’s game was played by the eight year old prodigy Samual Reshevsky in his historic appearance at Leeds, England on August 31, 1920. Before moving to the U.S. later that year, Reshevsky toured major European cities, including Paris (where he scored 20-0) and London, giving simultaneous exhibitions. 

    During his stop in Yorkshire, he visited the Leeds Chess Club. It’s interesting that as an adult he regarded his play in those old simultaneous displays as quite meritorious. Edward Winter has an interesting post on Reshevsky as a prodigy HERE. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Event "15 bd Simul, Leeds. Eng"] [Site ""] [Date "1920.08.31"] [Round "?"] [White "Samuel Reshevsky"] [Black "George W. Beaumont"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C34"] [Annotator "Stockfish 19"] [PlyCount "59"] [EventDate "1920.??.??"] {C34: King's Gambit Accepted} 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 d6 4. Bc4 Be6 5. Bxe6 fxe6 6. d4 g5 {This is questionable. Black's best move is 6...Qf6} (6... Qf6 7. O-O e5 8. Nc3 c6 {with equality.}) 7. O-O {It would be more advantageous to white to play 7.h4!} h6 8. Qe2 {This is too passive. For white to have any hope of gaining an advantage he has to play 8.g3} (8. g3 fxg3 9. hxg3 {and now either 10.Nc3 or 10.d5 would be about equal.} Bg7) 8... a6 {This is a waste of time. Simply 8...Bg7 was correct.} (8... Bg7 9. g3 Qd7 10. gxf4 g4 11. Nh4 Bxd4+ {followed by 12...Nc6 leaves black with an excellent position/}) 9. Ne1 {Likewise, Reshevsky wastes time, but his plan of breaking up black's K-side Ps remains.} Qe7 10. g3 e5 11. Nc3 Nf6 (11... exd4 {is a bad tactical error.} 12. Nd5 Qd7 13. Bxf4 gxf4 14. Rxf4 Be7 15. Qh5+ Kd8 16. Qg6 {and the R invades on f7 with decisive results.}) 12. dxe5 dxe5 13. Nd3 Nc6 14. Nd5 {This innocent looking move has set up a critival position that black fails to appreciate.} Nxd5 {This is an error that lets his advantage slip. He should have delayed this capture a move and played 14...Qg7} (14... Qg7 {Black intends to castle Q-side and will remain a solid P up and have K-side attacking potential} 15. Nxf6+ Qxf6 16. Qh5+ Qf7 17. Qxf7+ Kxf7 {Black is much better.}) 15. exd5 Nd4 16. Qh5+ Kd8 {White has now achieved equality.} (16... Qf7 17. Qxf7+ Kxf7 18. Nxe5+ {White has equalized.}) 17. Bd2 {Black must now continue aggressively with ...e4 and ...Bg7} Qf6 {Now Reshevsky could secure a solid positional advantahe with 18.Rae1 and 19.Bc3. Instead he plays an unsound tactical move.} 18. Nxe5 {Strictly speaking this is not a blunder nor is it really unsound, but it loses the advantage and results in equality. Fortunately for Reshevsky, his opponent falls for the bluff, but he can hardly be blamed because the way to equalizing is quite difficult to see!} Rh7 $2 {[%mdl 8192] This loses quickly.} (18... Qxe5 19. Rae1 {The game saver is the problem-like...} Ne2+ $3 20. Rxe2 Bc5+ 21. Kg2 Qxd5+ 22. Rf3 {with fully equal chances.}) 19. Rae1 {White has brought his last piece into play and is now ready to launch a decisive attack.} Bd6 (19... Bc5 {presents no danger to white.} 20. Kh1 Re7 21. gxf4 {with an easy win.}) {]} 20. gxf4 {[%mdl 32]} (20. Nc6+ {Threatening 21.Qe8# was a cute little trap. Black can avoid it with} Kd7 21. gxf4 gxf4 (21... bxc6 22. fxg5 Qg7 23. Qg4+ {is decisive.}) 22. Nxd4 Qxd4+ 23. Kh1 Rf8 24. Bc3 Qc5 25. Bf6 {Material is equal, vut black's poeces are too disorganized to offer any serious resistance.}) 20... Bc5 21. Kh1 c6 22. fxg5 {White quickly wins a lot of material.} Qd6 23. Nf7+ Rxf7 24. Qxf7 Qxd5+ 25. Qxd5+ cxd5 26. gxh6 Kc7 27. h7 Rh8 28. Rf7+ Kb8 29. Bf4+ Ka7 30. Be5 {Black resigned. All in all not a bad performance by an 8-year old playing a simul and having only a few seconds per move.} 1-0

Lasker’s Greatest Game?!

    Bobby Fischer held a very low opinion of Emanuel Lasker dismissing him as a "weak player" who lacked a deep understanding of modern openings and positional play. On the other hand, Garry Kasparov (who I think was a much better player than Fischer) viewed Emanuel Lasker as a towering genius who relied heavily on a practical, flexible, and deeply psychological approach. 

    In any case, is there something we amateutr can e learned from playing over Lasker’s games? He famously tailored his moves to exploit opponent's psychological weaknesses. He was willinn to enter objectively inferior, but complicated, positions if he thought his opponent would struggle more to navigate them than he would. And, he was is legendary for turning lost or passive positions around by finding hidden defensive resources. All moot points for amateurs!  

 

    Nevertheless, his games are enjoyable to play over and he considered the following game to be one of one of his best and he wasn’t alone. So did Amos Burn and Frank Marshall. They were all wrong! Check out the Fritz/Stockfish 19 Blunder Category Chart: 

 

[Event "St. Petersburg Quadrangular 1895/96"] [Site ""] [Date "1896.01.04"] [Round "?"] [White "Harry N. Pillsbury"] [Black "Emanuel Lasker"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "D50"] [Annotator "Stockfish 19"] [PlyCount "60"] [EventDate "1895.12.13"] {D50: Queen's Gambit Declined} 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 c5 5. Bg5 cxd4 6. Qxd4 Nc6 7. Qh4 {This is not the best continuation. 7.Bxf6 as Pillsbury, himself, concluded after thoroughly analyzing the position.} (7. Bxf6 gxf6 8. Qh4 dxc4 {and both 9.Rd1 and 9.e3 result in an equal position.}) 7... Be7 8. O-O-O {While this is sound, it is not totally without risks.} Qa5 9. e3 Bd7 10. Kb1 h6 $1 {Clever; the Q is stuck on h4 until the B is exchanged.} 11. cxd5 (11. Bd3 {would be a mistake.} Rc8 12. e4 d4 13. Ne2 e5 14. Bd2 Qa6 {and black is much better.}) 11... exd5 12. Nd4 O-O 13. Bxf6 Bxf6 14. Qh5 {Pillsbury's K-side attack is, in reality, nothing more than a gesture, but there isn't a really good plam available.} Nxd4 15. exd4 $17 Be6 {The calm before the storm.} 16. f4 {Played with the intention of initiating a P-storm on the K-side, but while Lasker's next move looks innocent enough, it turns out to be extremely crafty.} Rac8 17. f5 {No doubt Pillsbury was expecting 17...Bd7} Rxc3 {An unexpected surprise. Contemporary player Amos Byrn called it, "One of the finest (combinations) ever made." That's an exaggeration because in reality the move is neither better nor worse than the prosaic 17...Bd7} 18. fxe6 (18. bxc3 {is out of the question.} Rc8 19. Rc1 Bd7 {and white's exposed K is doomed. For example...} 20. Qf3 Bxd4 21. cxd4 Bxf5+ 22. Bd3 Qb4+ 23. Ka1 Qxd4+ 24. Kb1 Bxd3+) 18... Ra3 $1 {White's position is bad, but not lost if he finds the right defense.} 19. exf7+ $2 {[%mdl 8192] Whicj he does not and now his position is completely lost/} (19. bxa3 $3 {As far as I know none of the old time commentators even considered this unlikely looking defense because it just lookd bad! Engines play it instantly and now black's advantage os far from a winning one.} Qb6+ (19... Qxa3 $4 {loses} 20. exf7+ Rxf7 21. Qxd5 {White is a R up.}) 20. Bb5 Qxb5+ 21. Ka1 fxe6 22. Qh3 Qe2 23. Kb1 Qe4+ 24. Qd3 Qxg2 {White has a R vs, B+2Ps and black's advantage is not so great.}) 19... Rxf7 20. bxa3 Qb6+ 21. Bb5 {This is pretty much forced} Qxb5+ 22. Ka1 {White is dead lost, but as far as I know nobody has ever recognized black’s next movre as a blunder that should have tossed away the win.} Rc7 $2 (22... Qc5 23. Qg4 Re7 24. Rd3 Re4 25. Qd1 Rxd4 26. Rxd4 {An amazing position! Capturing the R lets white escape.} Qb6 $3 (26... Bxd4+ 27. Kb1 Qc3 28. Qc1 Qa1+ {Draw!}) 27. Qb3 Qxd4+ 28. Kb1 Qa1+ {wins the R.}) 23. Rd2 {A draw would be the proper outcome of this position.} Rc4 {[%mdl 128] White needs to defend precisely and that means playing only 24.Re1} 24. Rhd1 $4 {[%mdl 8192]} (24. Re1 Qa5 25. Re8+ Kh7 26. Qf5+ g6 27. Re7+ Bg7 28. Rxg7+ Kxg7 29. Qe5+ Kh7 30. Qe7+ {Draw}) 24... Rc3 $2 (24... Qc6 {The only winning move, but it requires intricate play. Practically speaking a draw would not be a surprising outcome} 25. Kb1 Bg5 26. Re2 (26. Qe2 Bxd2 27. Qxd2 Qg6+ 28. Kb2 Qb6+ 29. Ka1 Qc7 30. Rf1 Rc2 31. Qd3 {Black is winning.}) 26... Rc1+ {Mate next move.}) 25. Qf5 {White is the exchange up. but making any real progress wi;; be difficult.} Qc4 26. Kb2 $4 {The annotator has now run ouit of question marks! It's now black to play and win!} (26. Kb1 $1 {keeps the advantage. After} Qc6 27. Rc2 {White has defended against any mate threats and is the exchange up.}) 26... Rxa3 $3 {[%mdl 512] Nice!} 27. Qe6+ (27. Kxa3 {gets mated.} Qc3+ 28. Ka4 b5+ 29. Kxb5 Qc4+ 30. Ka5 Bd8#) 27... Kh7 28. Kxa3 Qc3+ 29. Ka4 b5+ 30. Kxb5 Qc4+ {White resigned.} 0-1

An Instructive Game by Lipnitsky

    The name and games of the Ukrainian player Isaac Lipmitsky (1923-1959, 35 years old) are not well know, but they should be. Invitations to international tournaments were controlled by the USSR Chess Federation and he never got the chance to compete internationally so never had the chance to earn a title, but he was certainly at the GM level. 

    Chessmetric estimates his highest ever ratting to have been 2700 at the end of 1950, placing him at #12 in the world. His rating then began falling rapidly and by the end of 1955, he had dropped 200 points. He dies in Kiev in 1959 of polycythemia, a rare, slow growing blood cancer. 

    With polycythemia the bone marrow produces too many red blood cells, thickening the blood and disrupting its normal flow. Many people do not experience any symptoms initially. When symptoms do occur they can vary. Fatigue and weakness with persistent lack of energy and general tiredness, frequent headaches, dizziness, feeling faint, double or blurred vision, ringing in the ears and shortness of breath. particularly when lying down, are all symptoms. Tiday there is still no cure, but it can be treated. 

    Lipnitsky was a two-time Ukrainian champion (1949, 1956). He was a childhood companion and rival of David Bronstein. During World War II Lipnitsky served in the Soviet Red Army, fought in the Battle of Stalingrad,and was decorated four times. After the War he had some good results, but in later years,his play was affected by poor health. 

 

 

 

    Lipinsky was the author of the highly influential biik Questions of Modern Chess Theory. It was originally published in Russian in the Soviet Union in 1956. An updated English translated was published in 2008. It’s still worth reading today! 

 

[Event "USSR Champ Final, Moscow"] [Site ""] [Date "1950.12.11"] [Round ""] [White "Isaac Lipnitsky"] [Black "Efim Geller"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "E71"] [Annotator "Stockfish/Lipnitsky"] [PlyCount "141"] [EventDate "1950.11.12"] [EventType ""] [EventRounds ""] [EventCountry "URS"] [SourceTitle "URS-ch"] [Source "ChessBase"] [SourceVersion "1"] [SourceQuality "1"] {E71: King's Indian} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 O-O 5. Be3 d6 6. h3 e5 {At the time this game was played the Soviet players were just beginning to experiment with the King's Indian. White's main options are 7.d5 and 7.Nf3.} 7. d5 {In answer to this black generally plays 7...a5 and then ...Nbd7-c5. Here, instead, black plays to open the c-file which is to white's advantage.} c6 8. Bd3 Na6 9. Nge2 cxd5 10. cxd5 Nc5 {White is slightly better.} 11. Bc2 Nh5 (11... a5 {is more accurate.} 12. O-O Bd7 13. a3 a4 14. Ng3 b5 {with equal chances. Moroni,L (2560)-Prokofiev,V (2464) Prague 2026}) 12. O-O {More precise was 12.Qd2, preventing a later ...Qh4} (12. Qd2 Qh4 $2 13. Bg5) 12... h6 {This is weakening. 12...Bd7 followed by ...f5 would have given him active play.} (12... Qh4 {is premature because after} 13. Qd2 {The Q has to retreat.} Qe7 14. g4 Nf6 15. b4 {White has the advantage.}) 13. Rc1 {White's plan is to take the initiative on the Q-side where he has an advantage in space, but this is a wasted move because later the R will have to return to a1. His best move was still Qd2.} a5 14. Kh2 Bd7 15. a4 {To prevent ...b5} (15. Bxc5 {was his best move. After} dxc5 16. Ba4 c4 17. Bxd7 Qxd7 18. a4 {White is clearly better.}) 15... Kh7 {Probably th best move is 15...Rc8/ The move played practically eliminates any chance of playing ...f5 because of the B on c2.} (15... f5 {It should probably be pointed out that in such positions black frequently plays this advance, but here the advance would favor white and so Geller has not played it.} 16. Bxc5 dxc5 17. Ng1 Qf6 18. Qe2 {followed by Qc4 with the better game.}) 16. Qd2 Rc8 17. Ra1 {White has two pieces tied to the defense of his a4-pawn. By returning his rook to al he not only over-protects this pawn but also prepares to bring the rook into the action via the third rank.} Qh4 18. Ra3 {A clever move that will prove quite useful! In Lipnitsky's celebrated Sovier classic Questions of Modern Chess Theory he explains, "Up to now both sides have been strengthening their positions without undertaking any resolute action, but soon the first clash Will inevitably occur, and then the placing of the rook on a3 will prove very much to the point. Incidentally this move stops the knight on c5 from forking on 133, which would be possible in some lines."} b6 19. Ng1 {"White wants to drive the black Q away with g2-g3, and to do this he must defend h3. In addition, by freeing the e2 square, he is thinking of playing Bc2-d1-e2-b5 to exchange the light-squared Bs. This would enable him to begin gradually conquering the key points on the Q-side and attacking the Ps on b6 and d6...while black has been having difficulty forming a convenient plan that would not involve ...f5, white's play on the Q-side is clear. It does not suit Geller's temperament to wait patiently while his opponent gets on with his plans, so he resorts to the move f7-f5 from which he has been refraining for so long." Lipnitsky} f5 $1 {Lipnitsky's comments notwithstanding, now is the time to play this as it results in black gaining full equality.} 20. g3 Qe7 21. exf5 Bxf5 (21... gxf5 {is also playable.} 22. Qe2 Qe8 23. Nf3 e4 24. Nd2 Be5 {with equal chances.}) 22. Nge2 Bxc2 {According yo Lipnitsky, "Black need not have hurried to make this exchange, as it only helps white to gain control of the light squares." However, there is absolutely nothing wrong with Geller's move and the chances are equa;ll.} 23. Qxc2 Nf6 {"It was here that black should have tried to exploit the weakness of d3 and f3 by playing 23...e4, because with his next move white takes measures against that thrust." Lipnitsky. Again, Geller's move is perfevtly acceptable/} (23... e4 24. Bxc5 Rxc5 25. Qxe4 Qxe4 26. Nxe4 Rxd5 {has simplified into equality which may be why Geller did not go for it...his style was to keep things complicated.}) 24. f3 Qf7 {"Black diverts the white Q from the b1-h7 diagonal. Once again, some highly intricate play would result from 24...e4...It should be noted that black was already in time trouble." Lipnitsky} (24... e4 25. Bxc5 Rxc5 26. Nf4 Rc4 27. Ne6 {anf both 27...Nxd5 and 27...Rf7 yield equal chances.}) 25. Qd2 g5 26. g4 {"An important juncture. White manages to seize the e4-square, which opens up the prospect of later reaching a favourable endgame with a N on e4 versus the B on g7." Lipnitsky} Ng8 {Black is transferring thr N to g6, but in the process misses the move that maintains the balance.} (26... e4 $1 27. f4 Nfd7 28. Ng3 gxf4 29. Bxf4 Qg6 30. Nf5 Ne5 {with complications galore.}) 27. Ng3 Ne7 28. Bxc5 bxc5 29. Nge4 Rb8 {Black is not afraid Of 30,Nxd5} 30. Rf2 {Now capturing on d6 is a threat.} (30. Nxd6 Qf4+ 31. Qxf4 Rxb2+ 32. Rf2 Rxf2+ 33. Kg3 exf4+ 34. Kxf2 Rb8 {with equal chances.}) 30... Rfd8 31. Ra1 Qf4+ 32. Qxf4 {"In view of black's potential maneuver ...Ne7-g6-h4, white cannot avoid this capture which opens the diagonal of the black B." Lipnitsky} exf4 33. Re1 {Now the position is one of complete equality and bith players begin jockeying fot posotion.} Ng6 34. Nb5 $1 Ne5 35. Rd1 Rb6 36. b3 Kg6 37. Kg2 Bf8 {"In acute time trouble Geller probably could not work out all the variations following the 37...c4." Lipnitsky} (37... c4 38. bxc4 Nxc4 39. Rc1 Ne3+ {with equal chances.}) 38. Rc2 Bg7 $2 {After this Geller should have found himself in serious trouble.} (38... Re8 39. Rdd2 Nd7 40. Re2 Re5 {Neither side seems to be able to make progress.}) 39. Kf2 $2 {Missing a winning tactical shot. Funny thing...Lipnitsky was silent hereabouts!} (39. Nexd6 Rdxd6 40. Nxd6 Rxd6 41. Rxc5 {and the passed d-Pawn yields a win.}) 39... Bf8 {Correcting his mistake.} 40. Kg2 Re8 41. Rc3 {"An advantage for white has taken shape, based on the weakness of black Ps on a5 and d6, and also the bad black B. If two Rs and a N could be removed from each player's army, black would have a completely lost endgame. In many variations a march by the white K from d3, along one of the routes d3-c4-b5 or d3-e4-f5, would be decisive." Lipmitsky. Stockfish disagrees evaluating the position at 0.00 which does not mean the position is drawn only that the chances are equal. However, as someone once said, some pigs are more equal than others, and the same thing can be said of chess positions.} Nf7 42. Rd2 {"If black were now to sacrifice the exchange on e4, so as to fortify himself by bringing the B to e5, white would win after carrying out a K-side brcakthrough with h3-h4." Lipmitsky} Ne5 (42... Rxe4 $3 {Again, Stockfish disagrees.} 43. fxe4 Bg7 44. Rf3 h5 45. gxh5+ Kxh5 {and there is no breakthrough possible.}) 43. Re2 Nf7 $1 {"Black is extremely restricted in his maneuvres. He not only has to look after his P on d6, he also needs to guard against a potential sacrifice on that square followed by a capture on e5 (should the black rook have moved away from c8). He must also prevent Qc4-d2-c4!." Lipmitsky} 44. Rcc2 Bg7 45. Kf1 Re5 {"Black is unable to avoid a R exchange after the Non e4 moves away." Lipnitsky} 46. Nec3 Rxe2 47. Nxe2 {[%mdl 32]} Rb7 48. Nc1 Re7 {After this black is is real danger.} (48... Bd4 {won't allop white to male any progress as he cannot safely take the B.} 49. Nxd4 cxd4 50. Rd2 Ne5 51. Rxd4 Nxf3 52. Rd3 Ne5 {and black is winning.}) 49. Re2 Ne5 {"Of course another R exchange would only hasten black's defeat. But then the game was no longer to be saved anyway." Lipnitsky} (49... Rxe2 50. Kxe2 Bf6 51. Nd3 Be7 52. Na7 Bd8 53. Nc6 Kf6 54. Nb2 Bc7 55. Nc4 {wins}) 50. Re4 $2 {"Clearly 50.Nxd6 would allow black counterplay." Lipnitsky} (50. Nxd6 Rd7 51. Nf5 Kf6 52. d6 Bf8 {and black has equalized.}) (50. Nd3 {results in a winning ending for white after} Kf6 51. Nxe5 dxe5 52. Nd6 Bf8 53. Rd2 Ra7 54. Nc4 Rd7 55. Nxa5) 50... Rd7 51. Ke2 Bf6 $2 {Black can hold his position after 51...Rd8} 52. Nd3 $18 h5 53. Nxe5+ Bxe5 {[%mdl 4096] As Lipnitsky will demonstrate, this ending is won for white.} 54. Kd3 hxg4 55. hxg4 Re7 56. Re2 Rd7 57. Rh2 {"As white wants to transfer his Nto c4, he now needs to stop the black R froin seizing the h-file." Lipnitsky} Rb7 58. Kc2 Re7 59. Na3 Bd4 60. Nc4 Re1 61. Nxd6 Re3 62. Ne4 Rxf3 63. d6 {[%mdl 32]} c4 64. bxc4 {[%mdl 32]} Re3 65. d7 Bb6 66. c5 Bc7 67. Nd6 Re7 68. Rh6+ $3 $146 {[%mdl 512]} Kxh6 69. Nf5+ Kg6 70. Nxe7+ Kf7 71. Nc6 {Black resigned. A very instructive game by Lipnitsky.} 1-0

An Amazing Game, Mutesi vs. Miladi

   In 2010, Silent Images made a short documentary film about Phiona Mutesi. In 2012, a book was published about her titled The Queen of Katwe: A Story of Life, Chess, and One Extraordinary Girl's Dream of Becoming a Grandmaster. Then in 2016, The Walt Disney Company made a film about her, the Queen of Katwe. 

    I don't mean to take anything away from Ms Mutesi's accomplishments who grew up in a difficult background and discovered chess as a way out of her situation. Nor do I fault Disney for making a feel good movie about her, and the massive awareness campaign that, hopefully, helped to solve some of her and her family's problems. But… 

    ...chess-wise, the whole thing was Hollywood hype. She was hardly a prodigy and being awarded the Woman Candidate Master title by FIDE was an affront to thousands of female players who are far better players. In 2012, FIDE awarded Mutesi the lowest-ranked title following her performance in the 40th Chess Olympiad in Istanbul. The title requires that recipients reach, at least once, a rating of 2000. At the time, she was rated 1686, won only one game, against a Korean rated 1542. She also drew three games and lost three. This hardly seems good enough to be worthy of a title. 

    I am aware of the argument that one reason for her low rating might be the fact that players in her country don't get a lot of chances to play against FIDE rated opponents and when they do, they are usually paired either against much stronger or equally low rated opponents so it's hard to raise their ratings. Hence, ratings are inconclusive as indicators of their actual strength. If that's valid reasoning, why doesn't FIDE give every player who is in a similar situation a title? 

    According to a number of GMs, who are qualified to judge, her performance was no better than an average club player. One GM said, “Let me not mince words: by a purely objective standard, Phiona is not a strong chess player; she is equivalent to a weak-to-average club player (class C or B in the US).” 

    Mutesi was born in Uganda in1996. Her rating is listed as being1774 and her last tournament appears to have been at the Women’s Olympiad that was held in Batumi, Georgia in 2018. She graduated from college in 2021, with a bachelor's degree in business administration and management. According to Google’s AI report she is living ans working in Canada. 

    Her opponent in the following exciting game was Amein Milani (born 1996), a Women’s Candidate Master from Tunisia. She does not have a standard raring, but her rapid rating is 1705. While not especially well played, the game was interesting and it did have its moments of brilliance. 

 

[Event "Olympiad (Women), Baku"] [Site "New York"] [Date "2016.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Phiona Mutesi"] [Black "Amen Miladi"] [Result "1-0"] [Annotator "Stockfish 19"] [ECO "B23"] [WhiteElo "1622"] [BlackElo "1491"] [WhiteFideId "-1"] [BlackFideId "-1"] [PlyCount "79"] [GameId "2360085585621079"] [EventDate "1893.??.??"] [SourceVersionDate "2026.09.29"] {B23: Closed Sicilian: Lines without g3} 1. e4 c5 2. f4 {the Grand Prix Attack.} e6 {According to many experts black's best reply is 2...d5 and if 3.exd5 Nf6 (the Tal Gambit) with good play for black. As a result, white started playing 2.Nc3 first. Miladi's move is a less common option that dates back to the days of La Bourdonnais in the 1830s.} 3. d3 (3. Nc3 Nc6 4. Nf3 d5 5. Bb5 {is the main line.}) 3... d5 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. Bd2 (6. g3 Be7 7. Bg2 b5 8. O-O {Manhardt,T (2240)-Petschar,K (2266) Feffernitz AUT 2015. Black has more play.}) 6... a6 (6... b6 7. e5 Ng8 8. g3 Nge7 9. Bg2 Nf5 10. O-O h5 {Black's position is the more active. Hartoch,R (2390)-Van der Wiel,J (2520) Amsterdam 1982}) (6... Be7 {This is the most often seen move.} 7. g3 a6 8. e5 Nd7 9. Bg2 b5 {equals. Hort,V (2575)-Wirthensohn,H (2420) Biel 1981}) 7. e5 {This is not bad, but 7.g3 with a Closed Sicilian is more usual.} Nd7 8. Be2 Be7 9. O-O O-O 10. Rb1 {Evidently she intended to stymie black’s Q-side advance with the followup a3 and b4. The position of the B on d2 hinders white from any forceful action. The only other reasonable move is 10.Qe1 hoping to support the advance of the e-Pawn.} b5 11. a3 Qb6 {Preventing white’s planned b4.} 12. Kh1 a5 {Black plans ...b4} 13. Qe1 b4 14. axb4 axb4 15. Nd1 {[%mdl 32]} Ba6 {This move is designed to help support the advance of the c-Pawn. It’s clear that black has come out of the opening well because her Q-side P-structure and active pieces give her good prospects. This does not mean she is in no danger because her K-side lacks support by her pieces as can be seen when her position soon deteriorates.} 16. Nf2 Bb5 {This move is by no means bad, but perhaps countering in the center with 16...f6 would have proved better in the long run.} 17. Ng4 {After this once the Q reaches g3 white has some threats against black’s K. A better plan was bringing thje N over to the K-side via e7 and so 17...Bd8 was good.} h5 {This takes measures against Qg3, but this creates a weakening of black’s K-side which she will shortly regret.} 18. Nf2 Ra2 19. Nh3 $16 c4 20. Nfg5 cxd3 21. cxd3 {Black should now play 21...Qd4 attacking the b-Pawn. Instead she walks into a pin.} Nd4 22. Be3 Bc5 {This breaks the pin, but at this point black is lost.} 23. Qh4 $1 {It's clear that black is in serious difficulty; there are no pieces available with which she can defend her K.} g6 (23... Nxe2 $2 {is met by} 24. Qxh5 {Threatening mate on h7} Rc8 25. Qxf7+ Kh8 26. Bxc5 Nxc5 27. f5 Ra7 28. Qh5+ Kg8 29. Qh7+ Kf8 30. Qh8+ {White is winning.}) 24. Bxd4 Bxd4 {[%mdl 32]} 25. Bxh5 $1 {[%mdl 512]} Kg7 26. Qg3 Rh8 (26... gxh5 27. Nxe6+ Kh8 28. Qg7#) 27. Be2 {Missing the win and allowing black to equalize.} (27. Nxf7 {results in a winning position after} Rxh5 28. Nd6 {Black has a small material advantage, but white's pieces are in dominating positions. It's hartd to fault Mutesi for not going into this line because it's hard to evaluate and there is no forced win. The best continuation is} Ra8 29. Rbe1 Rah8 30. f5 exf5 31. e6 Nf6 32. Nxb5 Bc5 33. Rc1 Qxb5 34. Qc7+ Kh6 35. Rxc5 Qxd3 36. Qf4+ g5 37. Qxf5 Qxf5 38. Rxf5 Kg6 39. Re5 Ra8 40. Rc1 Re8 41. Rc6 Re7 42. Rb6 d4 43. Kg1 d3 44. Rd6 Ng4 45. Red5 {White is winning, but nobody is going to calculate all of this!}) 27... Bxb2 {This position is dead equal, but the complications are enormous! White has two good continuatuions.} 28. Qg4 {This should have allowed black to gain the advantage with the unlikely looking 28...Bc3!} (28. Bd1 {A non-human move!} Qd4 29. Nxf7 Qxd3 30. Bf3 Kxf7 31. Ng5+ Ke7 32. Nxe6 Qf5 33. Ng7 Qf7 34. Rfd1 Bc4 35. e6 Qxg7 36. exd7 Bd4 37. Rxb4 Rd8 38. Bxd5 Bxd5 39. Qg5+ Kd6 40. Rb6+ Bxb6 41. Qxd5+ Kc7 42. Qxa2 Rxd7 43. Rxd7+ Qxd7 44. Qc4+ {This is a draw.}) (28. Bg4 Bc3 29. f5 Bxe5 30. f6+ Bxf6 31. Bxe6 Ra3 32. Nf4 Bxd3 33. Nxd3 fxe6 34. Rxf6 Kxf6 35. Qf4+ Ke7 36. Qf7+ Kd8 37. Qxg6 Kc8 38. Nxb4 Qc7 39. h3 Rc3 40. Nd3 Qg3 41. Qg7 Rxh3+ 42. gxh3 Qxd3 43. Ra1 Qe3 44. h4 Rc1+ 45. Rxc1+ Qxc1+ 46. Kh2 Qf4+ {Draw!}) 28... Qa6 (28... Bc3 {White's attack has reached a standstill and now it's black's piece that are in dominating positions.} 29. Rbc1 Rd2 30. Rfd1 (30. Nf2 Ra2 31. Nd1 Bd2 32. Rb1 Nc5 {White's attack has been beaten off and black has established a winning position.}) 30... Rxd1+ 31. Rxd1 b3 {This passer decides the game in black's favor.}) 29. Rfd1 $2 {Mutesi has overestimated the strength of her opponent's threat.} (29. f5 $1 {was the only good move.} exf5 30. Rxf5 Nxe5 31. Rxf7+ Nxf7 32. Ne6+ Kf6 33. Rf1+ Ke7 34. Nhf4 Kd6 $1 {The only good move.} 35. Nxg6 {The complications are unfathomable!}) 29... Nc5 30. Qf3 $2 {This should have lost!} (30. f5 exf5 31. Qxb4 Ba3 32. Qxb5 Qxb5 33. Rxb5 Rxe2 {is fully equal.}) 30... Bc3 $1 {The threat is 31...Rxe2 followed by ...Bxd3 forking the Q and R} 31. Ng1 Ra8 32. Qh3 Rh8 33. Qe3 d4 34. Qg3 Ba4 (34... Rxe2 {secures the win.} 35. Nxe2 Bxd3 36. Rxd3 Qxd3 37. Qxd3 Nxd3 {and black's passed Ps are a winning advantage.}) 35. Rf1 {[%mdl 32] Milandi now fails to realize the grave danger she is in.} Bc2 $4 {[%mdl 8192]} (35... Kf8 36. h3 (36. f5 {This is no longer a threat.} gxf5 $3 {Much better than 36...gxf5} 37. h3 Bc2 {Black is winning/}) 36... b3 {is winning for black.}) 36. f5 $3 {Crushing.} Bxb1 37. fxe6 {Not that ot matters. but 37.Fxg6 leads to a mate in 12.} Nxe6 38. Rxf7+ Kg8 39. Rf6 Rxe2 40. Nxe6 {Black resigned. A very difficult game for both sides.} 1-0