Random Posts

  • Revisiting Minor Pieces for a Rook Part 2
  • Simple Chess
  • It was the best of matches, it was the worst of matches...
  • Capablanca – Nimzovich
  • Ventnor City 1940
  • Korchnoi-Kasparov
  • 1948 New Zealand Championship
  • Words of Wisdom from National Master James R. Schroeder
  • Flooded!
  • Albert Weissman, 1953 US Intercollegiate Championship
  • Monday, March 3, 2014

    More on Rooks vs. Minor Pieces

         I recently did a post on this subject where Tahl’s R defeated Botvinnik’s minor pieces as a follow up to the post Two Minor Pieces vs. Rook and Pawn….which to choose? where I gave some general guidelines on playing these positions. I mentioned in that post that GM Arthur Bisguier once said that against a weaker opponent he could win with either side and maybe that’s the best rule concerning this situation…be the stronger player!
         I recently came across the game by Bisguier where he made that comment. In the game his opponent, John Donaldson, came up with a nice combination early on that won a N and B for a R and P. Donaldson managed to outplay Bisguier in the opening and middlegame, but after they traded down to a position where Donaldson had a B,N and 5 P’s vs. Bisguier’s R and 5 P’s they had a position where theoretically Donaldson should have won. He failed to win though because, being the stronger player, Bisguier understood the position better.

    No comments:

    Post a Comment