When it comes to picking Alehome’s greatest game it;s impossible because he had so many, but his game against Reti at Baden-Baden, 1925 has to be one of them. It’s been annotated by a lot of GMs including Gary Kasparov. You’ve probably seen it before, but even if you have it’s worth looking at again.
Following World War I which ended in November of 1914 no really great tournaments had been held in Germany and so Tarrasch prevailed upon the authorities Baden-Baden, a famous spa city, to host another international tournament...the last had bee in 1870!
Unfortunately neither Emanuel Lasker and Jose Capablanca both priced themselves out of the market when they insisted on a large appearance fee which officials were either unwilling or unable to meet.
Also invited but unable to accept because of their professional employment were Milan Vidmar, an electrical engineer and college professor, and Geza Maroczy, at the time an auditor with the Hungarian government. Alekhine’s win at Baden-Baden was just the first of great wins to come. The others were San Remo in 1930 and Bled in 1931.
A game that I liked (Fritz 17)
Richard Reti–Alexander Alekhine0–1A00Baden-Baden GERBaden-Baden GER25.04.1925Stockfish 16
A00: Reversed Alekhine 1.g3 Alekhine called this move eccentric. e5 2.f3 This is the eccentric move! The opening is now an Alekhine Defense with the
colors reversed! e4 3.d4 d5 3...c5 4.b3 c4 5.d4 c5 5...c6 6.c3 c5 7.g2 f6 8.0-0 xd4 9.cxd4 xd4 This weird position offers equal
chances. Wohl,A (2415)-Hamdouchi,H (2615) Catalan Bay 2003 6.e3 d5 7.d3 cxd3 8.cxd3 f6 Black is a little better. Katavic,B (2197)-Pejic,I (2097)
Split CRO 2011 4.d3 exd3 5.xd3 As far as I know this move has not been
commented on, but 5.cxd3 is a good alternative. 5.cxd3 f6 6.g2 e7 7.0-0 0-0 8.c3 c5 9.b3 h6 10.f4 c6 11.c1 g4 12.h3 h5 13.g4 g6 14.g3 c8 15.h4 b6 16.d2 d4 17.xf6 xf6 18.d5 e7 A draw as agreed.
Zacurdajev,M (2374)-Serov,M (2275) St Petersburg 2007 5...f6 Here or on
the next move black could also have played ...c5 6.g2 b4+ 7.d2= xd2+ 8.xd2 0-0 9.c4 Alekhine stated that (apart from his eccentric
first move) Reti has played the opening very well. He is correct...Stocjfish
evaluates the position as dead even. a6 It's a bit off that Alekhine avoids
...c5, but Alekhune;s move is, as might be expected, perfectly satisfactory. 10.cxd5 10.a3 prevent ...Nb4, but then black has c5 11.c2 dxc4 12.xc4 e6 13.2f3 c6 with complete equality. 10...b4 11.c4 bxd5 12.2b3 c6 13.0-0 e8 14.fd1 g4 15.d2 c8 16.c5 h3 The play of neither
side can be faulted as evidenced bny the fact that Stockfish offers 17.Bxd5,
17.Bh1, 17.Bf3 and 17.Nf3 as all being of bearly equal worth! 17.f3 g4 18.g2 h3 And now ...b6 would win. 19.f3 g4 Obviously Alekhine is willing
to accept the draw. Had Reti taken the draw bwith 20.Bg2 Alekhine would still
have finished first by a full point. 20.h1 To quote a better annotator
than I, "Had Reti played 20.Bg2, the game would have ended in a draw by
repetition and we would not seen a brilliant combination..." Soviet GM
Alexander Kotov. h5 Just the slightest hint of what's coming. 21.b4 a6 22.c1 h4 23.a4 It's hard to fault Reti's play on the Q-side as technically the
position remains equal, but hindsight indicates that play in the center might
have been better. 23.e4 b6 24.d3 bd7 25.f3 with the slimest advantage
and black's shenanigans on the K-side have been greatly reduced. 23...hxg3 24.hxg3 c7 25.b5 White is not yet facing a astrophysics, but just a
smidgen better would have been 25.e4. axb5 26.axb5 e3 "It seems almost
incredible that this spectacular move not only stops white's attack but even
brings him serious trouble. And yet it is so. It is obvious enough that the R
cannot be taken because of 27...Qxg3, followed by 28... Nxe3 and wins; and
also that white has to do something in order to parry 27... Rxg3!, etc."
Alekhine. It's is an amazing move and one that Stockfish hit upon in an
instant. However, the engine also evaluates the position a equal (0.18). 27.f3 "As the following shows, this move loses perforce." Alekhine, 27.fxe3
loses outright. xg3+ 28.g2 xe3 White cannot prevent ...Qxg2# 27.f3
This move throws a monkey wrench into the works... xf3 28.exf3 and there
is no black attack. Play might continue... cxb5 29.xb5 a5 30.cd1 30.fxe3 xd2 31.c2 xe3+ 32.g2 At first glance it's hard to believe that
black is winning, but here is how it's done... b4 33.c4 a2+ 30...e1+ 31.xe1 xd2 with complete equality. 27...cxb5 Again, I quote a better
annotator than myself. "The start of a typhoon that sweeps almost all the
pieces from the board." Kasparov 28.xb5 28.d4 would have been tougher
for black to meet. a4 29.b2 c4 30.xc4 bxc4 31.d4 e8 32.e1 c3 33.xc3 xc5 and black's piece activity and two passed Ps assure him of a
significant advantage. 28...c3 29.xb7 xb7 30.xb7
Even with the Qs off the board and with his R and N attacked black has a
stunning continuation. xe2+ 31.h2 Now what?! e4 Alekhine
explains the position: "The beginning of a new combination, wich however, is
the absolutely logical consequence of the previous maneuvers, aiming, after a
series of twelve practically forced moves, at the capture of white's exposed
Nt at b7. Black's R is still taboo as 32. fxe3? Nd2 would lose the exchange."
Alekhine. The move also receive high praise from Kasparov and Fuscher, so you
know it simply must be good! 32.c4 xf2 Worse is 32...xf3 33.xe4 xe4 34.fxe3 xh1 35.xh1 xg3+ and it;s highly doubtful that black could win. 32...xf3 is also a clunker. 33.xe2 xf2+ 34.xf2 xf2 35.d5 with a
likely draw. 32...xd2 is met by 33.xd2 e6 34.fxe3 a2 35.e4 xd2 36.c2 xc2 37.xc2 with a draw. 33.g2 Black is clearly winning, but
Alekhine's final combination makes this game a true masterpiece. e6 An
important key move of the combination. And not 33...xf3 34.xf3 xf3 35.xe2 White is equal. 33...e4 It must be pointed out that this is an
equally effective move. 34.dc2 a6 Threatening ...Ra6 35.h4 2xg3 36.xe4 xe4 37.c5 xc5 38.xc5 h6 and wins 34.cc2 g4+ 35.h3 e5+ 36.h2 xf3 37.xe2 g4+ 38.h3 e3+ Of his next move Alekhine wrote, "The
final point! winning a piece." 39.h2 xc2 40.xf3 d4 White resigned. 40...d4 41.f2 xf3+ 42.xf3 d5 with a won ending. 0–1
Saemisch's 3rd place finish is a bit of a surprise. In most books we only see examples of him losing to one of the immortals, but he must have been pretty good himself!
ReplyDeleteChess metrics estimated his highest ever rating to have been 2665 in 1929 placing his at 10th in the world.
Delete