A major advantage of the fianchettoed King’s position is its ability to resist an attack.
However, if the fianchettoed Bishop is exchanged the King’s position is seriously weakened. And, without the fianchettoed Bishop, the opening of the g-file and the weakness of f6 and g6 (or f3 and g3) can be significant.
Also, remember that the position of the g-Pawn can make the attacker's task of opening up the h-file by the advance of his h-Pawn a dangerous possibility.
Short version...without the Bishop the castled position becomes weak and vulnerable and the squares that the missing Bishop covered result in a serious weakness.
An attack against the fianchettoed position is typically carried out by a Pawn advance and, hopefully, the elimination of the Bishop and the breaking up of the Pawn structure in front of the King.
![]() |
Kurt Richter |
Kurt Richter (1900-1969) was born in Berlin in 1900 and was awarded the IM title in 1950 on the first designation of titleholders. He was a sharp attacking player and theoretician.
His opponent, Leonhard Abramavisius (1900 (?) -1960) was a Lithuanian master. In 1950, he tied for 1st in the Lithuanian championship.
Kurt Richter (Germany)–Leonardas Abramavicius (Lith)1–0C11Hamburg Olympiad8Hamburg GER18.07.1930Stockfish 15
Vereson Attack 1.d4 d5 2.c3 f6 3.g5 In the Veresov white plays for
fast development. He will often play e2-e4. And, frequently players castle on
opposides making for some interesting play. Here the game reached a what
appears to be a rather benign position from the French Defense. As will be
seemn, appearances can be deceptive. e6 4.e4 dxe4 5.xe4 e7 6.xf6 xf6 7.f3 d7 8.d3 0-0 9.e2 c5 10.0-0-0 cxd4 11.g4 11.h4 e7 12.eg5 12.b1 b6 13.a1 c5 14.xc5 xc5 15.g5 g6 16.f4 as in Negi,P (2634)-Ghane,
S (2375) Dubai UAE 2010. Whie has a promising position. 12...f6 13.e5 c7 14.g4 d6 15.f4 b6 16.hf1 b7 17.c4 with equal chances. Sutovsky,E
(2660)-Ivanchuk,V (2711) Moscow 2002 11.xf6+ is playable' it results in
equality. xf6 11...xf6 12.xd4 d7 12.e4 h6+ 13.b1 f6 14.xd4 11...g6 11...e7 12.h4 12.g5 a5 13.b1 c5 14.xc5 xc5 15.hg1
Philippe,C (2392)-De Val,D (2149) Pula 2005. White's position us the more
active. 12...c7 13.b1 b6 14.fg5 b7 15.xh7 xh7 16.f6+ White is
considerably better. Sutovsky,E (2661)-Kovacevic,A (2559) Neum 2004 12.h4
Black's position is quite solid and his next move looks plausible. But, it is,
in fact, a seriuous mistake. g7 12...b6 An odd looking way to defend
against the K-side attacck, but what ot does is allow black to escange off
some attacking minor pieces. 13.h5 c5 14.hxg6 14.xc5 bxc5 15.hxg6 hxg6 14...xd3+ 15.xd3 fxg6 The position is equal. 13.h5 Black is now
facing a dangerous attack. e8 14.hxg6 hxg6 15.g5 It's hard to imagine the
lurking danger on the h-file thanks to the defending B on g7. e5 16.h4 f8 16...b6 is still his best defensive chance. 17.c4 c5 18.f6+ xf6 19.gxf6 xf6 20.dh1 f5 and black can probably survive. 17.dh1 f5 18.f1 Planning toi sacrifice on h8 c8 Poor Abranavicius! He doesn't
suspect a thing. 18...d7 had to be played. 19.h8+ 19.fd2 f8
leaves white clearly better, but there is no forced win. 19...xh8 20.xh8+ xh8 21.h1+ g8 as in the game does not work because the N on d7 covers f6. 19.h8+ Brilliant! xh8 20.xh8+ This is the only
followup that does not leave black winning! xh8 21.h1+ h7? 21...g8
is a better defense. 22.f6+ xf6 23.gxf6 c6 24.xf5 xf6 Black is lost
here, too, but he can at least make white work for the point. Here's how a
Shootout variation went... 25.d3 g7 26.g5 e7 27.d5 c6 28.f4 exf4 29.xd4+ f6 30.f3 g5 31.xa7 d6 32.c5 ed7 33.f5 e7 34.b4 e3 35.d2 d4 36.c4 e7 37.b2 c7 38.b3 cd7 39.a4 7d5 40.c8 d7 41.e8 xd3+ 42.cxd3 xd3+ 43.c2 d7 44.d6 b6 45.f5+ g8 46.c3 c7+ 47.d2 h7 48.e1 d7 49.a5 bxa5 50.bxa5 a7 51.d8 f7 52.b6 d7 53.a6 g6 54.d6 g4 55.b1+ g7 56.f5+ f7 57.h6+ g7 58.xg4 g6 59.b6 f3 60.a7 xa7 61.xa7+ f8 62.d4 f2+ 63.xf2 e5 64.d8+ f7 65.xf6+ e8 66.e6+ d8 67.xe5 c7 68.c6+ b8 69.d7+ a7 70.b6+ a8 71.a6# 22.f6 g7 23.h6+ It's mate next move so black resigned. 1–0
No comments:
Post a Comment