Random Posts

Thursday, September 22, 2022

A Lesson On Connected Passed Pawns

     One of my early instructional books that I probably gained the most from was Ludek Pachman's classic, Modern Chess Strategy. In the book's section on passed Pawns, he wrote that two united passed Pawns are a dangerous weapon, but the possessor of such Pawns must make sure that they cannot be blockaded and that, as a rule, such Pawns should advance together
     Pachman gave the following game as an illustration of what happens if the Pawns are blockaded. In the final position white's connected passed Pawns on the Q-side went nowhere while black's connected passed Pawns in the center marched to victory. 
     When Pachman gave this as a model game he left the reader with the impression that Gligoric's opening strategy was completely faulty and, a a result, it was doomed from the beginning. But, thanks to Stockfish and Komodo it is clear that that was not the case. 
     In fact, the opening line as late as move 18 was played in at least four later games and white won them all, so clearly black's position after 17....Ne8 actually favors white slightly as is indicated by Stockfish and Komodo. Based on the evidence then, it's clear that Gligoric's loss must be attributed to a later error and not faulty opening strategy. 
     Still, the game is a good example of the principle that two united passed Pawns should not be allowed to be blockaded as Gligoric allowed to happen in this game and its instructional value is not diminished. 

A game that I liked (Komodo 14)

[Event "Helsinki Olympics (Men) prel-B"] [Site "Helsinki FIN"] [Date "1952.08.11"] [Round "?"] [White "Svetozar Gligoric (Yugoslavia)"] [Black "Laszlo Szabo (Hungary)"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "E42"] [Annotator "Stockfish 15"] [PlyCount "79"] [EventDate "1952.??.??"] {Nimzo-Indian: Rubinstein} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e3 {[%mdl 32]} c5 5. Nge2 d5 6. a3 cxd4 7. exd4 Be7 8. c5 O-O 9. b4 b6 10. g3 bxc5 11. dxc5 (11. bxc5 {is also favorable to black after} Nc6 12. Bg2 Ba6 13. Bf4 Bc4) 11... a5 { This allows white to get two united passed Ps and so it seems illogical, but the Ps are not as dangerous as they seem because they can be easily blockaded.} 12. Rb1 axb4 13. axb4 {Szabo's play in the opening has not lead to a decisive positional advantage as some past annotators have claimed...the correct evaluation here is black is slightly better.} Nc6 {Today's powerful engines suggest that 13...Na6 would have been ever so slightly better, but the resulting complications are probably beyond a player's ability to calculate over the board.} (13... Na6 14. Bg2 Rb8 15. Nd4 Bd7 (15... Nxb4 16. Rxb4 Rxb4 17. Nc6 Qc7 18. Nxb4 Qxc5 {is unclear.}) (15... Rxb4 16. Nc6 Rxb1 17. Nxd8 Rxc1 18. Qxc1 Nxc5 19. Nc6 Nd3+ 20. Kd2 Nxc1 21. Nxe7+ Kh8 22. Rxc1 {favors white.}) 16. Nc2 e5 17. Nxd5 Nxd5 18. Qxd5 Bf5 19. Qxd8 Rfxd8 20. Rb2 Bxc2 21. Rxc2 Nxb4 {is about equal.}) 14. Bg2 (14. b5 {fails for tactical reasons.} Ne5 {The threat is simple ...Nf3#} 15. Bg2 Bxc5) 14... Rb8 15. Ba3 (15. b5 Bxc5 16. bxc6 Rxb1 17. Nxb1 Qb6 {and black has attacking chances in exchange for his material investment. Just for example...} 18. Nbc3 Bxf2+ 19. Kf1 Ng4) 15... Bd7 (15... Ba6 {was better as demonstrated in Belous,V (2524)-Goganov,A (2469) St Petersburg 2011} 16. O-O Bc4 17. Re1 {Now, after the correct 17...Nd7 black has a very slight advantage. However, the position is so delicate that after he played 17...e5 white was better and eventually managed to score the point.}) 16. O-O (16. b5 {Must be renounced because it is flawed tactically.} Ne5 17. O-O Qc8 {winning a P and leaving the other one very weak.} 18. c6 Bxa3 19. cxd7 Nfxd7) 16... Na7 {Headed for b5 to blockade the P.} 17. Re1 Ne8 {The second N joins in the plan to blockade white's Ps.} (17... Nb5 {is punished by} 18. Nxb5 Bxb5 19. Nd4 Qd7 20. Nxb5 Qxb5 21. Bb2 {and white has a decisive advantage after, say, 21...Rfc8 22.Bf1 and 23.Bd4 because the Q is a poor blockader. Note that the P cannot be taken.} Qxb4 22. Bxf6 {with a discovered attack on the Q.}) 18. Bc1 (18. Nd4 {was tried in three later games and it's neither better nor worse than Gligoric's move. White is slightly better here in any case.} Nc7 19. Qd2 (19. Na4 Bf6 20. Nb6 e5 21. Nf3 Bf5 22. Ra1 {is equal. Panczyk,K (2375)-Pokojowczyk,J (2380) Bytom 1986}) 19... Bf6 20. f4 Qc8 21. Nce2 Rd8 22. Bb2 {White is slightly better. Garcia Palermo,C (2520) -Pinter,J (2540) Luzern 1985}) 18... Bf6 {Pachman declared that this move is part of black's attacking plan and also makes the observation tht white now errs in his plan to draw black's Ps forward with the idea of attacking them and at the same timne increasing the scope of his B on g2.} 19. Bf4 {Pachman assigned this move a ? without comment, but it is Komodo's first choice and white's advantage is put at just over a half of a P.} e5 {While this move ultimately serves black well it actually gives white the advantage.} (19... Nc7 20. Bd6 Re8 21. Nd4 {White's pieces are well placed, but black has adequate defensive resources so the position must be considered equal.}) 20. Bd2 {This retreat is an excellent move.} (20. Nxd5 exf4 21. Nexf4 {White's b- and c-Pawns and two well placed Ns are not quite sufficient compensation for black's two Bs and his slight material advantage.}) 20... d4 21. Nd5 {Not at all bad, but slightly more accurate would have been 21.Ne4 eyeing d6} Bc6 22. Nxf6+ Qxf6 23. Bxc6 Qxc6 {At this point the position must still be considered equal.} 24. f4 f6 25. Qb3+ Kh8 26. Rf1 {A subtle error after which black gains a very slight advantage.} (26. g4 {gaining active play on the K-side would have assured white of a small, but lasting advantage.} Nc7 27. Ng3 Rbe8 (27... Nab5 28. fxe5 fxe5 29. Rxe5 {picks up a P.}) 28. fxe5 fxe5 29. Qd3 {Keeping a watchful eye on e4 and b5} Nab5 30. Rf1 Rxf1+ 31. Rxf1 {White is slightly better.}) 26... Nc7 27. Qc4 Nab5 28. Rbe1 {Because the hope of advancing his Q-side Ps has long disappeared white has shifted his Rs around in an attenpt to defend against black's advancing Ps and as a result black now has the initiative. Pachman incorrectly assured readers that it's too late, black has a won position, but that is over optimistic. Evaluation: Komodo black by about a half a P, Stockfish 1.5 Ps.} h6 29. g4 {This makes g3 available for the N. It's interesting to note that white's Q-sdie Ps are not playing any part in the game at this point.} Rbe8 30. f5 {[%mdl 8192] This is a serious positional mistake because it gives black two connected passed Ps in the center.} (30. fxe5 fxe5 {also gives black two connected passe Ps in the center, but with the major difference that they can be blockaded.} 31. Rxf8+ Rxf8 32. Ng3 Qf3 33. Rf1 Qa8 34. Rxf8+ Qxf8 {with equal chances. In fact, white is slightly better.} 35. Qd3) 30... Qd5 31. Qc1 {[%mdl 8192] This is really where white starts down the trail that leds to a loss. His best bet was to exchange Qs because now black's Q is in a dominating position.} (31. Qxd5 Nxd5 32. Ng3 Rb8 (32... Ra8 { is not quite as strong.} 33. Ne4 Rfb8 {White's best try is...} 34. c6 Rb6 35. Rc1 Ne7 36. c7 Rc8 37. Rc5 Rxc7 38. Ra1 {with some play.}) 33. Rb1 Na3 34. Rb3 Nc4 35. Be1 Nde3 36. Rf2 {Black is clearly better, but at least white can play on with some hopes of salvaging the game.}) 31... Kh7 32. Ng3 e4 {[%mdl 32] With his Ps on the move black is clearly winning. White's Ps on the other hand have not budged.} 33. Bf4 e3 34. Qd1 Qc4 {Prevents Qd3} 35. h4 Nd5 36. g5 d3 37. Qg4 Rg8 38. Nh5 Re4 39. g6+ Kh8 40. Qf3 {White exceeded the time limit in this hopeless position.} (40. Qf3 e2 41. Rf2 Nxf4 42. Nxf4 d2 {wins easily.}) 0-1

No comments:

Post a Comment