Random Posts

  • Dr. Max Euwe
  • A Great Game by Paul Michel
  • Arena Chess Program Review
  • A Fischer-Rossolimo Slugfest
  • The Best Chess Engine for Correspondence Play is...
  • Close Race At Amsterdam 1950
  • 1945 Canadian Championship Miniature
  • Fischer's First US Championship
  • The Fusifrom Face Area and Chess
  • A Briiliant Win By Al Horowitz
  • Thursday, September 22, 2022

    A Lesson On Connected Passed Pawns

         One of my early instructional books that I probably gained the most from was Ludek Pachman's classic, Modern Chess Strategy. In the book's section on passed Pawns, he wrote that two united passed Pawns are a dangerous weapon, but the possessor of such Pawns must make sure that they cannot be blockaded and that, as a rule, such Pawns should advance together
         Pachman gave the following game as an illustration of what happens if the Pawns are blockaded. In the final position white's connected passed Pawns on the Q-side went nowhere while black's connected passed Pawns in the center marched to victory. 
         When Pachman gave this as a model game he left the reader with the impression that Gligoric's opening strategy was completely faulty and, a a result, it was doomed from the beginning. But, thanks to Stockfish and Komodo it is clear that that was not the case. 
         In fact, the opening line as late as move 18 was played in at least four later games and white won them all, so clearly black's position after 17....Ne8 actually favors white slightly as is indicated by Stockfish and Komodo. Based on the evidence then, it's clear that Gligoric's loss must be attributed to a later error and not faulty opening strategy. 
         Still, the game is a good example of the principle that two united passed Pawns should not be allowed to be blockaded as Gligoric allowed to happen in this game and its instructional value is not diminished. 

    A game that I liked (Komodo 14)

    Svetozar Gligoric (Yugoslavia)Laszlo Szabo (Hungary)0–1E42Helsinki Olympics (Men) prel-BHelsinki FIN11.08.1952Stockfish 15
    Nimzo-Indian: Rubinstein 1.d4 f6 2.c4 e6 3.c3 b4 4.e3 c5 5.ge2 d5 6.a3 cxd4 7.exd4 e7 8.c5 0-0 9.b4 b6 10.g3 bxc5 11.dxc5 11.bxc5 is also favorable to black after c6 12.g2 a6 13.f4 c4 11...a5 This allows white to get two united passed Ps and so it seems illogical, but the Ps are not as dangerous as they seem because they can be easily blockaded. 12.b1 axb4 13.axb4 Szabo's play in the opening has not lead to a decisive positional advantage as some past annotators have claimed...the correct evaluation here is black is slightly better. c6 Today's powerful engines suggest that 13...Na6 would have been ever so slightly better, but the resulting complications are probably beyond a player's ability to calculate over the board. 13...a6 14.g2 b8 15.d4 d7 15...xb4 16.xb4 xb4 17.c6 c7 18.xb4 xc5 is unclear. 15...xb4 16.c6 xb1 17.xd8 xc1 18.xc1 xc5 19.c6 d3+ 20.d2 xc1 21.xe7+ h8 22.xc1 favors white. 16.c2 e5 17.xd5 xd5 18.xd5 f5 19.xd8 fxd8 20.b2 xc2 21.xc2 xb4 is about equal. 14.g2 14.b5 fails for tactical reasons. e5 The threat is simple ...Nf3# 15.g2 xc5 14...b8 15.a3 15.b5 xc5 16.bxc6 xb1 17.xb1 b6 and black has attacking chances in exchange for his material investment. Just for example... 18.bc3 xf2+ 19.f1 g4 15...d7 15...a6 was better as demonstrated in Belous,V (2524)-Goganov,A (2469) St Petersburg 2011 16.0-0 c4 17.e1 Now, after the correct 17...Nd7 black has a very slight advantage. However, the position is so delicate that after he played 17...e5 white was better and eventually managed to score the point. 16.0-0 16.b5 Must be renounced because it is flawed tactically. e5 17.0-0 c8 winning a P and leaving the other one very weak. 18.c6 xa3 19.cxd7 fxd7 16...a7 Headed for b5 to blockade the P. 17.e1 e8 The second N joins in the plan to blockade white's Ps. 17...b5 is punished by 18.xb5 xb5 19.d4 d7 20.xb5 xb5 21.b2 and white has a decisive advantage after, say, 21...Rfc8 22.Bf1 and 23.Bd4 because the Q is a poor blockader. Note that the P cannot be taken. xb4 22.xf6 with a discovered attack on the Q. 18.c1 18.d4 was tried in three later games and it's neither better nor worse than Gligoric's move. White is slightly better here in any case. c7 19.d2 19.a4 f6 20.b6 e5 21.f3 f5 22.a1 is equal. Panczyk,K (2375)-Pokojowczyk,J (2380) Bytom 1986 19...f6 20.f4 c8 21.ce2 d8 22.b2 White is slightly better. Garcia Palermo,C (2520) -Pinter,J (2540) Luzern 1985 18...f6 Pachman declared that this move is part of black's attacking plan and also makes the observation tht white now errs in his plan to draw black's Ps forward with the idea of attacking them and at the same timne increasing the scope of his B on g2. 19.f4 Pachman assigned this move a ? without comment, but it is Komodo's first choice and white's advantage is put at just over a half of a P. e5 While this move ultimately serves black well it actually gives white the advantage. 19...c7 20.d6 e8 21.d4 White's pieces are well placed, but black has adequate defensive resources so the position must be considered equal. 20.d2 This retreat is an excellent move. 20.xd5 exf4 21.exf4 White's b- and c-Pawns and two well placed Ns are not quite sufficient compensation for black's two Bs and his slight material advantage. 20...d4 21.d5 Not at all bad, but slightly more accurate would have been 21.Ne4 eyeing d6 c6 22.xf6+ xf6 23.xc6 xc6 At this point the position must still be considered equal. 24.f4 f6 25.b3+ h8 26.f1 A subtle error after which black gains a very slight advantage. 26.g4 gaining active play on the K-side would have assured white of a small, but lasting advantage. c7 27.g3 be8 27...ab5 28.fxe5 fxe5 29.xe5 picks up a P. 28.fxe5 fxe5 29.d3 Keeping a watchful eye on e4 and b5 ab5 30.f1 xf1+ 31.xf1 White is slightly better. 26...c7 27.c4 ab5 28.be1 Because the hope of advancing his Q-side Ps has long disappeared white has shifted his Rs around in an attenpt to defend against black's advancing Ps and as a result black now has the initiative. Pachman incorrectly assured readers that it's too late, black has a won position, but that is over optimistic. Evaluation: Komodo black by about a half a P, Stockfish 1.5 Ps. h6 29.g4 This makes g3 available for the N. It's interesting to note that white's Q-sdie Ps are not playing any part in the game at this point. be8 30.f5 This is a serious positional mistake because it gives black two connected passed Ps in the center. 30.fxe5 fxe5 also gives black two connected passe Ps in the center, but with the major difference that they can be blockaded. 31.xf8+ xf8 32.g3 f3 33.f1 a8 34.xf8+ xf8 with equal chances. In fact, white is slightly better. 35.d3 30...d5 31.c1 This is really where white starts down the trail that leds to a loss. His best bet was to exchange Qs because now black's Q is in a dominating position. 31.xd5 xd5 32.g3 b8 32...a8 is not quite as strong. 33.e4 fb8 White's best try is... 34.c6 b6 35.c1 e7 36.c7 c8 37.c5 xc7 38.a1 with some play. 33.b1 a3 34.b3 c4 35.e1 de3 36.f2 Black is clearly better, but at least white can play on with some hopes of salvaging the game. 31...h7 32.g3 e4 With his Ps on the move black is clearly winning. White's Ps on the other hand have not budged. 33.f4 e3 34.d1 c4 Prevents Qd3 35.h4 d5 36.g5 d3 37.g4 g8 38.h5 e4 39.g6+ h8 40.f3 White exceeded the time limit in this hopeless position. 40.f3 e2 41.f2 xf4 42.xf4 d2 wins easily. 0–1

    No comments:

    Post a Comment