Random Posts

  • Lipschutz vs. Showalter
  • Never Resign?
  • Four Book Reviews
  • Stockfish 4
  • Alexander Tsvetkov, Bulgarian Master
  • Larsen Offers the Same Rook Twice
  • Fischer and Bisguier Slug It Out
  • 1967 Metropolitan Masters
  • 6600 Tactical Training Positions
  • More on Fred Reinfeld
  • Monday, January 17, 2011

    Becoming a Master

    An excellent article on becoming a master can be found in the USCF’s online magazine HERE.

    In the article Matan Prilleltensky describes how he did it. He wrote, "...after crossing 2100 in late '07, I figured the next step couldn't be far off."  He finished first in the under-2300 section at the 2007 World Open but then states, “…my undergraduate years finished with 2200 no closer than it was two years prior.”

    He makes an astute observation: “It was finally time to revise my thoughts about chess strength. Many of us are dishonest with ourselves when we examine our ratings. Of course we are underrated - unlucky against lower rated players, perhaps, or frequently having opponents stumble onto good moves. Nonsense! There seems to be some confusion about the rating system's purpose. It is not a measure of your ‘chess understanding', future potential, or anything like that. It is a quantitative reflection of your results in tournament chess. As such, it is inherently accurate to a considerable degree. If your four digit number is an unsatisfying one, play better! I promise that will make it go up.” Emphasis mine.

    Even if your goals are more modest, his article is worthwhile reading. Be sure and check it out!

    No comments:

    Post a Comment