The House Un-American Activities Committee conducted
numerous investigations during 1951. They had concentrated on
two major probes, the Communist infiltration in Hollywood and the Red
foothold in defense plant areas, especially those in the Baltimore,
Maryland and Boston, Massachusetts areas. Other probes concerned
Communist activities in Hawaii, the Communist Party's National Farm
Commission and the Sorge spy ring. Initial witnesses, union
officials from the Baltimore area, refused to state whether they were
Communists and declared the Committee's questions were designed to
embarrass their unions. They also refused to answer many other questions
and cited their rights against self-incrimination.
The Committee was at it again in 1957 and 1958. The April 18, 1958 edition
of the Jewish Post in Indianapolis, Indiana carried a brief
story stating that Maryland chess whiz Irving Kandel, accused by
the House Un-American Activities Committee of being a Communist
ringleader in Maryland, was the center of a controversy in the
Maryland Chess Federation over whether he should be allowed to
continue as a member...Spokesmen for two state clubs said
their groups would drop out of the federation rather than play games
against Kandel. Kandel, a 44-year-old member of the Maryland Chess Federation, was
described by investigators for a House Un-American Activities
sub-committee as one of the ringleaders of the communist
conspiracy in Maryland.
In 1957 Kandel appeared before the Committee where he was identified
as head of District 4 and he also invoked the fifth amendment
concerning his present or past leadership of District 4. While on the witness stand he stonewalled the committee and refused to answer most questions, as was his fifth amendment right.
When one witness was asked, “Did Comrade Kandel take over on the
issue of desanctification of Stalin?” the reply was, “I believe
his name has just now entered the discussion. Kandel, I might point
out, was introduced to me as the head of the party in the State of
Maryland.”
Q:
“What was the statement, what were the statements he made with
reference to the desanctification of Stalin?”
A:
“Well, Comrade Kandel only met with our club twice. The second time
he met with our club he discussed the Khrushchev report. And the
general tenor of his remarks were-and he followed the article in a
current issue of Political Affairs that dealt with that. He
followed the article fairly closely, but the general tenor of his
remarks was that it would be a good thing, that he felt that the
party would benefit by this criticism, and it would open up new
opportunities for the party to strengthen itself….and that would
result would have a beneficial effect. That was the general tone of
his remarks on that.”
Q:
“What did Kandel say, if you recall, with reference to the
Khrushchev speech?”
A:
“Well, Kandel lauded that speech. He felt that the substance of
that speech was sound and that we should study it carefully and be
guided by it. Now, there are other things which show the relationship
there with the international Communist conspiracy. One is the fact
that the comrades are so elated, so elated over Communist successes
in other countries.”
Another witness, when asked, “Who is Irving Kandel? Do you know
him?” conferred with his lawyer and refused to answer. Additional
witnesses were asked questions about Kandel.
Q:
“What type of meetings were these that you held with these two
people?”
A:
“Underground meetings.”
Q:
“What gave you the impression that they were underground
meetings?”.
A:
“When Kandel came to the first meeting, he did not give the name;
but I recognized him, I had met him before I had joined the party. He
said he is not living at home; he is living under a different name,
and this is necessary to keep the party from being decapitated.”
Later
Kandel himself appeared before the committee for questioning.
Q:
“Kindly identify yourself by name, residence, and occupation.”
A:
“I believe, as close as I can figure, that those are three separate
questions. I wonder if you would be good enough, to avoid possible
confusion, to give your questions one at a time.”
Q:
“Before you do that, do you know the gentleman who is standing here
at the clerk's desk signing the voucher?”
A:
“Now, which one of these questions do you want me to answer first?
Q:
“The first question has been withdrawn. You have been asked if you
know the man who was signing this paper. Do you know him?”
A;
“There is no man there.”
Q:
“There he is. Turn around, you will see.”
A:
“Just a moment, now. I assume, Congressman Walter, that your
command turn around is your way of asking a question.”
Q:
“It is not any command. I just thought I would refresh your
recollection or assist you because the man was standing here and
moved.”
Kandel was then asked gain to identify himself by name, residence,
and occupation and he again conferred with his lawyer. He was the
directed by the Cahirman to answer the question, which he did.
Kandel stated, “My name is Irving Knndel. I live in the nine
hundred block, Brooks Lane. Now, you ask me my occupation. I wonder
what relevancy this question has to the ostensible purpose of this
committee.” To that the Chairman replied, “Answer the question.”
Kandel stated, “I refuse to answer the question because I believe
this question violates my rights under the first amendment, and
further, I claim my privilege under the fifth amendment not to be a
witness
against
myself.”
After
further discussion questioning continued…
Q:
“You work at the Fisher Brush Machinery Co. in Baltimore, do you
not?”
A:
“I have already refused to answer a question of that kind. I still
refuse to answer that question.”
Q:
“I put it to you as a fact that you work at the Fisher Brush
Machinery Co. in Baltimore, and I ask you now to confirm or deny that
fact.”
A:”
I refuse to answer that question on the same ground.”
Q:
“Do you honestly apprehend that, if you told this committee
truthfully while you are under oath whether or not you worked at
Fisher Brush Machinery Co. in Baltimore, you would be supplying
information which could be used against you in a criminal
proceeding?”
A:
“It might.”
And
so it went with Kandel reusing to answer any questions. When asked
if he had every used any other name, he again refused to answer.
Specifically, he was asked if he had ever used the name Henry Foss
and, again, he refused to answer.
Q:
“Are you a member of a labor organization?”
A:
“I don't know what connection this question has with the ostensible
purpose of this committee. I don't know what legislation would be
forthcoming. If I belonged, or do not belong, to any organization.”
When
directed to answer the question, he refused.
Q:
“Where and when were you born?”
A:
“In the United States in 1912.”
Q:
“What State?”
A:
“New York.”
Q:
“Give us a word about your education.”
A:
“In a word?”
Q:
“As many words as you need.”
A:
“I will be glad to. I started out by going to grammar school,
graduated, proceeded from there to junior high school. I went through
junior high school. It may well be that after that I took one or two
additional courses, but I can't remember exactly the consequences.”
Q:
“Did you take the courses? We are not concerned with the
consequences. We are merely asking you whether or not you took the
courses.”
A:
“The consequences I referred to, do with successfully completing
the course.”
Q:
“When did you last engage in your formal study?”
A:
“Well, a man should never stop studying.”
Q:
“Kindly tell us when it was you last were engaged in formal study
in an institution.
A:
“I assume by that you mean a school of some kind?”
Q:
“Yes.”
A:
“Well, it might be in 1943.”
Q:
“What school was that, please, sir?”
A:
“I believe it was a Navy school. As I remember, it was a school run
by the man by the name of Henry Ford for his company and utilized by
the United States Navy.”
Q:
“Were you then a member of the United States Navy?”
A:
“I was enlisted. I was recruited, drafted.”
Q:
“Tell us, please, sir, the period of your service in the Navy?”
A:
“To the best of my knowledge and belief, it was sometime during the
war, 1943, 1944, 1945 perhaps.”
Q:
'Where did you serve in the Navy?”
A:
“I served wherever they sent me.”
Q:
“Where did they send you?”
A:
“They first sent me to boot camp. As I remember, this place was in
the neighborhood of Sampson, New York…If my memory does not fail
me, I believe I went from there by way of Canada to Dearborn,
Michigan; and from that point, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, I was transferred to Norfolk, Virginia, I believe it is and
from there to San Francisco. From there to the Eniwetok group. Well,
that was in the Pacific, and it is hard to say when you are in the
Pacific exactly where you are.”
Q:
“Was all of the period of your active service aboard vessels in the
Pacific?”
A:
“Well, my whole period of service was active.”
Q:
'Was your entire period of service aboard vessels in the Pacific?”
A:
“No.”
Q:
“Tell us then where else you served.”
A:
“If I remember the name of the place. I believe it was called Tokyo
Bay.”
Q:
“Was the entire period of your service aboard vessels in the Navy
in the Pacific area?”
A:
“What area do you have in mind when you say Pacific area?”
Q:
'Did you serve in the Atlantic?”
A:
“No.”
Q:
“Thank you, sir. Did you receive a commission in the Navy?”
A:
“To do what?”
Q “A
commission as a commissioned officer.”
A:
“I was an officer. I was a non-commissioned officer.”
Q:
“What was your rank? The questions was then corrected by the
committee chairman that the correct term was rating, not rank and the
Chairman added that they wanted to keep the record absolutely
accurate. Kandels' reply was, “Splendid idea. Accuracy in this
committee would be a welcome event. I was a machinist mate, repair,
third class.”
Q:
“And to complete the picture and to be accurate about it all, were
you a member of the Communist Party while you were in the Navy?”
A:
“I refuse to answer that question on the grounds previously
stated.”
Q:
“Did you receive an honorable discharge from the Navy?”
A:
“Yes.”
Q:
“When was that, please, sir?”
A:
“At the end of my service.”
Q:
“What year was that?”
A:
“To the best of my recollection, it was around that period of 1946,
perhaps.”
Q:
“What was your first principal employment after the discharge which
you received from the Navy during this period around 1946?”
A:
“I refuse to answer that question on the grounds previously
stated.”
Q:
“And how long did that employment last?”
A:
“To what employment do you make reference?”
Q:
“The employment that you had immediately after your discharge from
the Navy.”
A:
“Have you established that I have employment?” When directed to
answer the question, Kandel refused.
Upon further questioning about his employment, Kandel was directed to
answer the question, but he could do so without disclosing any
information which could be used against him in a criminal proceeding.
He claimed he did not understand the question. When it was
rephrased, Kandel claimed he didn't see any sense in repeating the
same question that he didn't understand in the first place. Several
more questions were asked concerning his employment which he also
refused to answer.
Q:
“...I will endeavor to, with one simple little question: Have you
ever done anything since you were discharged from the Navy except
work for the Communist Party?”
A:
“That is about the simplest question I have heard in a long time.”
(Kandel conferred with his counsel) “You see, there is a premise
in your question, simple though it may be. The premise is that I
worked for the Communist Party.”
Q:
“Well, have you?”
A:
“Now, you are asking that as a question, have I worked for the
Communist Party?”
Q:
“Yes.”
A:
“I refuse to answer that question on the grounds previously
stated.”
Kandel was then showed a copy of the Communist New York Daily
Worker, Monday, November 1, 1948, "The Heroes of Yesterday
Speak Up Today!" World War II veterans demand dismissal of
indictments of the Smith Act defendants. It was a letter addressed
to the then President and the Attorney
General of the United States urging the dismissal of the indictments
against 12 Communist leaders.
It was pointed out to Kandel that on the letter was a list of names
of persons who sent the letter, including the name of Irving Kandel
and he was asked to verify the authenticity of that document and to
certify the participation by himself. After conferring with his
lawyer and some hemming and hawing, Kandel refused to answer.
Additionally, he refused to answer if he was a member of any labor
organizations and where he had lived prior to his current address. Eventually he did state
his previous address where he had lived for about 18 months. He
refused to answer questions about where he had lived in 1952 and
1953.
When it was put to Kandel that during 1952 and 1953, in an
underground operation of the Communist conspiracy, he lived at a
particular address under the alias of Henry Ross, Kandel's reply was,
“You say you state that as a fact? Do you have some supporting
evidence?”
Questioning
the was concerned about any tutoring or acting as an instructor in
any kind of classes. Kandel stated that the question was so broad
and general that it was almost impossible to answer, adding, “A
casual conversation might be considered by some as a class, or any
kind of conversation might be considered tutoring.” Asked point
blank if he ever taught in a Communist school, he refused to answer.
Q:
“Did you succeed George Meyers as head of the Communist Party in
District 4 while Meyers was in the penitentiary?”
A:
“It seems to me that that is a loaded question. You contain in it a
statement, a number of premises which have not been established to my
knowledge.” He was ordered to answer the question and refused. He
was then excused. No charges were ever brought against Kandle.
Irving Kandel (1914-1993) was a machinist by trade. He died December
21, 1993 of leukemia at a hospital in Westminster, Colorado. The
80-year-old Northwest Baltimore resident had been retired for 15
years after working for many years for the Maryland Cup Company. A
native of New York City who came to Baltimore as a young man, he
served in the Navy during World War II. Kandel was a tournament
bridge player as well as a chess player who won Maryland and New York
City championships in the 1950s and 1960s. At his request, no burial
services were conducted.
Kandel learned to play chess from his grandfather and was a member of
the 1929 CCNY chess team. After being away from chess for many years
he returned to win the Maryland State Cahmpionship in 1956, 57 and
58. He was also an accomplished postal player who won or tied for
first in the CCLA's Grand Nationals a record setting eight times.
No comments:
Post a Comment