Tuesday, September 29, 2020

Let's Talk About the de la Bourdonnais vs. McDonnell Matches


     At the time all the world, at least all the chess world, knew about the encounters of de la Bourdonnais and McDonnell. In 1834 the two hammered away at each other in a series of six (!) matches that confirmed that de la Bourdonnais was the leading player in the world. There wasn't any such thing as a World Champion at that time, but unofficially it had to be de la Bourdonnais. 
     de la Bourdonnais was considered the world's leading player from 1821, when he surpassed his mentor Alexandre Deschapelles. In 1823 La Bourdonnais defeated William Lewis, Britain's leading player, in a match in London, and in the spring of 1825 he played and defeated the best players that England had to offer. Nine years later he returned to London when a challenge was issued on McDonnell's behalf. 
     Between June and October 1834 the two played a series of six matches, a total of eighty-five games, at the Westminster Chess Club in London. Play generally began around noon, some of the games taking more than seven hours to complete. 
     After each game, McDonnell would return to his room exhausted, where he would spend hours pacing back and forth in a state of nervous agitation. Meanwhile, de la Bourdonnais would be downstairs regaling himself at the chessboard where he would continue to play till long after midnight, smoking cigars, drinking punch and gambling. 
     The two were evenly matched in their abilities, but wildly contrasted in their styles of play. de la Bourdonnais was known for the rapidity of his play, often replying to his opponent's moves within seconds, whereas the McDonnell sometimes took as many as two hours to make a single move. But despite his deliberation, McDonnell was a reckless player whereas de la Bourdonnais was always cautious. McDonnell's penchant for wild and often ill-considered attacks told against him during their matches. 
     The personalities of the two men were also different. de la Bourdonnais was an ebullient and garrulous individual. When winning, he grew talkative and affable; but when things went against him, he "swore tolerably round oaths in a pretty audible voice." McDonnell was taciturn and imperturbable. Winning or losing, he showed little emotion which seemed to unnerved his opponent. 
     In the first match of the series McDonnell's lack of big-match experience told against him and he was heavily defeated by sixteen games to five, with four draws (+5 -16 =4). But he quickly recovered from this setback and went on to win the second match by five games to four (+5 -4). 
     Although the title of World Chess Champion was not created until 1886 (with Wilhelm Steinitz as the first champion), the world's leading players from earlier times are recognized today as unofficial world champions. La Bourdonnais is usually regarded as the champion from 1821 until his death in 1840. 
     It was about 1824 that Deschapelles retired and declared de la Bourdonnais his successor. Shortly afterwards, he traveled to England and took on the best the country had, but nobody could defeat him. 
     He paid his next visit to England in 1834, and most of the players he had met ten years earlier were gone or retired. The only possible challenger was Alexander McDonnell who was giving his opponents at the Westminster Chess Society the odds of at least a Pawn. 
     On the arrival of de la Bourdonnais everyone was anxious to see the two play a match. McDonnelI declared himself ready to play upon any terms and in any manner. And so a match Of twenty-one games (draws not counting) was arranged. 
     It is amusing to note that no care was taken to prevent spectators from pressing closely around the players. During the first games played McDonneIl especially suffered from the inconsiderate crowding around of spectators; for his part, de la Bourdonnais was comparatively indifferent. 
     How bad was the problem with spectators? Early in the match at one point when the two players were engaged in one of their most trying positions a spectator walked in and first shook hands with both of them and then leaned over, rested his hands between the pieces and surveyed the position and began asking questions. "Is this your first game today?" "The Rook seems in the devil's own mess." Unbelievably, neither player seemed too upset! 
     The final match was abandoned in obscure circumstances, but apparently de la Bourdonnais was forced to return to France to deal with his creditors. McDonnell was leading 5-4 at the time. It seems the players had a loose agreement to continue the match at a later date. but that never happened. 
 
     As for the games, while there were some instances of brilliance, Harry Golombek found them to generally be of low quality especially the endgame technique. In one game McDonnell had an endgame with a R+2Ps vs. a R and did not know how to win. To make matters worse, he blundered away his R and lost the game! 
     de la Bourdonnais was not as bad as McDonnell in the endgame but he was weak in the opening. There were relatively few draws, but this was partly due to McDonnell's inaccurate defense which caused him to lose games instead of draw them. 
     In the end, de la Bourdonnais was clearly the better player. He was a professional with greater knowledge and experience while McDonnell was a gifted amateur who had not encountered first class opposition. 
     One positive outcome of their match was similar to what happened over a hundred years later when Fischer met Spassky in 1972 and the result was the Fischer Boom where more and more people began to follow and study the game, they began visiting chess clubs and new stars appeared. 
     While Golombek was probably right about the overall quality of play, the following game is quite interesting and it has a few unexpected twists and turns. They may have played using a set like THIS one. 

Alexander McDonnell - Louis de la Bourdonnais

Result: 0-1

Site: Match, London

Date: 1834

Sicilian: Lowenthal Variation

[...] 1.e4 c5 2.♘f3 ♘c6 3.d4 cxd4 4.♘xd4 e5 5.♘xc6 This move is almost never seen today, the modern masters preferring 5... Nb5 5...bxc6 6.♗c4 ♘f6 7.♗g5 ♗e7
7...♕a5 8.♗d2 ♕b6 9.O-O ♗e7 10.♗c3 d6 11.♕d3 O-O is completely equal. Prol Medeiros,H (2006)-Silva,L/Niteroi BRA 2019
8.♕e2 White has tried a number of moves here, all leading to equality.
8.♗xf6 ♗xf6 9.♕d6 ♕e7 10.♕xe7 ♔xe7 Schroeder,M (1452)-Clausen,D (1287)/ Dortmund 2006
8.♘c3 O-O 9.O-O h6 10.♗e3 ♗b7 11.♕f3 Schneider,A (2380) -Sieben,F/Kassel 1994
8.♕d3 O-O 9.♘c3 h6 10.♗h4 d6 11.O-O Oleniak,W (1882)-Graf,P (2127)/Police 2009
8...d5 So far the opening has been strikingly modern, but white's next move, an unprovoked parting with the two Bs is a poor idea. Better was 9.exd5 cxd5 10.Bb3 with equality. 9.♗xf6 ♗xf6 10.♗b3 O-O 11.O-O Black has to be considered better he because he has a strong center and the two Bs. 11...a5 12.exd5 Yeilding the center is not a good idea. Better was 12.Rd1 and 13.Bc4 12...cxd5 13.♖d1 d4 14.c4 Simply horrible as it fails to challenge black's center. Bringing his N to e4 was a reasonable idea. However, thanks to imprecise play by black later on, this P will pose a serious threat. 14...♕b6 15.♗c2 ♗b7 16.♘d2 ♖ae8 17.♘e4 ♗d8 18.c5 ♕c6 19.f3 ♗e7 20.♖ac1 f5 According to Stockfish this logical advance only results in white getting the chance to equalize. Black could have offered up a P for excellent chances with 20...Qh6, but that's a move that only an engine is likely to find!
20...♕h6 21.♕b5 ♗a6 22.♕xa5 ♗e2 23.♕d2 (23.♖e1 d3 is good for black.) 23...♗xd1 24.♕xh6 gxh6 25.♖xd1 and supposedly black stands well here, but this is not likely to be a position that would appeal to a human. In Shootouts black scored +3 0 =2 with white holding on for the draw at the higher plies (19 ans 21).
21.♕c4 ♔h8 22.♗a4
22.♘d6 This must be considered somewhat better. After 22...♗xd6 23.♗a4 ♕xc5 24.♕xc5 ♗xc5 25.♗xe8 ♗b6 (25...♖xe8 loses after 26.♖xc5 and a P is lost.) 26.♗a4 and black is only marginally better.
22...♕h6 23.♗xe8 An interesting position that contains a drop of poison! 23...fxe4 Alert play.
23...♖xe8 This careless move loses after 24.♘d6 ♗xd6 25.♕b5 ♖f8 26.♕xb7 and black can't save his B.
24.c6 exf3 25.♖c2 Another action packed position!The only way for black to sustain the advantage is to sacrifice his light squared B! 25...♕e3 ruins a very nice position
25...♗a6 26.♕xa6 e4 The onslaught of Ps wins for black. 27.♕b5 (27.gxf3 d3 28.♖g2 exf3 29.♖g3 ♗d6 also wins) 27...d3 28.♖f2 e3 29.♖xf3 e2 30.♖xf8 ♗xf8 31.♕xd3 ♗c5 32.♔h1 ♕e3 The winning move in a problem like position.
26.♔h1 Moving the K out of check seems right, but in this case it is wrong!
26.♖f2 Saves the game, but it takes some fancy footwork by both sides. To wit... 26...♗a6 27.♕xa6 ♗c5 28.♕f1 d3 29.♖xd3 ♕g5 30.♔h1 ♗xf2 31.♖xf3 ♖xf3 32.gxf3 ♗b6 With a likely draw.
26...♗c8 27.♗d7 f2 28.♖f1 d3 29.♖c3
29.♗xc8 was not any better as after 29...dxc2 30.♗a6 ♕c5 31.♕xc5 ♗xc5 32.♗d3 e4 33.♗xc2 e3 34.♗d3 ♗b6 black wins after ...Rd8
29...♗xd7 30.cxd7
30.♖xd3 is met by 30...♗e6 31.♕c2 ♕c5 32.♖d2 ♕xc2 33.♖xc2 ♗h4 34.c7 (34.g3 ♗d5#) 34...♔g8 and black is winning the ending
30...e4 31.♕c8 ♗d8 32.♕c4 ♕e1 The finish is a nice one. 33.♖c1 d2 34.♕c5
34.♖fxe1 leads to mate in three. 34...fxe1=♕ 35.♖xe1 dxe1=♕ mate next move.
34...♖g8 35.♖d1
Inferior is 35.♖fxe1 dxe1=♕ 36.♖xe1 fxe1=♕ 37.♕g1 ♕xg1 38.♔xg1 ♖f8 39.g3 e3 40.g4 e2 41.g5 e1=♕ 42.♔g2 ♕e2 43.♔h3 ♕f3 44.♔h4 ♖f4#
35...e3 36.♕c3 ♕xd1 37.♖xd1 e2 McDonnell resigned. (37...e2 38.h4 exd1=♕ 39.♔h2 f1=♕ 40.♕b4 ♗c7 41.♕f4 ♕xf4 42.g3 ♕xg3#)
Powered by Aquarium

No comments:

Post a Comment