Please visit the site for complete details and the top 100 list. Note: testing at 5 minutes plus 3 seconds per
move. The commercial Houdini hardly
seems better than the free version.
Name Elo
1 Houdini 2.0 STD 3018
2 Houdini 1.5a 3010
3 Komodo 4 2975
Critter 1.4a 2975
5 Komodo 3 2966
6 Deep Rybka 4 2955
7 Deep Rybka 4.1 2953
Critter 1.2 2953
9 Houdini 1.03a 2952
Komodo 2.03 DC 2952
11 Stockfish 2.2.2 JA 2951
12 Stockfish 2.1.1 JA 2941
13 Critter 1.01 2923
14 Stockfish 2.01 JA 2922
15 Rybka 3 mp 2904
16 Stockfish 1.9.1 JA 2902
17 Critter 0.90 2896
18 Stockfish 1.7.1 JA 2889
19 Rybka 3 32b 2852
20 Stockfish 1.6.x JA 2836
I don't see Firebird, or whatever it's successors are called. Is that because it's too weak, or not eligible in some way
ReplyDeleteGood question. I don’t know why the author of this test did not include it. As he said on his Blog, This rating list is made for my private enjoyment! Anyway, I sent him a massage asking about it. I posted on Firebird:
ReplyDeletehttp://tartajubow.blogspot.com/2011/04/firebird-chess-engine.html
In my limited test of all engines running on a single CPU, Strelka is close but still behind Houdini (and Critter)
ReplyDeleteStrelka55-test-All 1 CPU
Rank Name Hou Cri Str Sto Fir HIA Kom Points S-B %
1 Houdini 1.5a w32 SP X 3.5 3.0 2.5 4.0 5.0 5.5 23.5 / 35 362.50 67.14%
2 Critter 1.4 32-bit SP 2.5 X 3.5 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 23.0 / 35 362.75 65.71%
3 Strelka 5.5 3.0 2.5 X 3.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 20.0 / 35 320.50 57.14%
4 Stockfish 2.2.2 JA SP 2.5 2.0 3.0 X 4.0 2.5 4.0 18.0 / 34 296.75 52.94%
5 FireBird 1.2 w32 SP 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 X 4.5 3.0 15.5 / 35 250.00 44.29%
6 HIARCS 13.2 SP 1.0 1.0 1.5 3.5 1.5 X 3.5 12.0 / 35 197.75 34.29%
7 Komodo32 Version 4 - SP 0.5 2.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.5 X 10.0 / 35 172.25 28.57%
122 out of 231 games played
Level: 8 Minutes/Game
I received an e-mail from the site owner and he advised me that FireBird breaks several of the rules listed under the “conditions” he has listed. He was not specific on exactly which rules were broken though.
ReplyDelete