Robert J. Fischer (March 9, 1943 - January 17, 2008, age 64) was the World Champion from 1972 to 1975. These days his name is seldom mentioned, but there was a time when he was considered the ultimate authority. His play was brilliant, creative, daring, surprising, ingenious, eye-opening and revolutionary.
In the 1963 New York State Open held in Poughkeepsie over the Labor Day weekend Fischer, then the US Champion, scored a clean 7-0 sweep. It was the second time in recent months that Fischer had played in a weekend Swiss; the other was the Western Open in Bay City, Michigan which he also won.
At Poughkeepsie, Arthur Bisguier, James Sherwin, Joseph Richman and Matthew Green tied for second in the 58-player field with scores of 5.5-1.5.
The opening of the Fischer vs. Bisguier game was a surprise; Fischer abandoned his usual Ruy Lopez and pulled out an old Wilhelm Steinitz ideas. Some of Steinitz' ideas on positional play were stigmatized as bizarre.
In this game we see Fischer essay what was one of Steinitz’ most bizarre moves and it worked.
When this game first appeared the annotators made their comments based on the result and praised Fischer’s play as if it had been faultless.
While his play was innovative and clever, it was not perfect and it could not be claimed that Bisguier was outplayed! He held his own, but unfortunately the final part of the game was spoiled when he blundered. Still. GM Blunders are, if not always instructive, entertaining. Also, Fischer dud deserve credit for resurrecting Steinitz’ old suggestion.
[Event "New York State Open, Poughkeepsie"]
[Site "Poughkeepsie, NY USA"]
[Date "1963.09.02"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Robert Fischer"]
[Black "Arthur Bisguier"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C59"]
[Annotator "Stockfish 17"]
[PlyCount "57"]
[EventDate "1963.??.??"]
{C59: Two Knights Defense} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 {Surprise! Uo until this game Fischer had always played the Ruy Lopez.} Nf6 {Bisguier loved sharp play, so this was what he usually played and Fischer was prepared for it.} 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Na5 6. Bb5+ c6 7. dxc6 bxc6 8. Be2 h6 {So far normal stuff; this could be considered the Main Line.} 9. Nh3 {Another surprise! This odd-looking move was recommended by Steinitz who introduced it in a telegraph match against Chigorin back in 1891. Steinitz lost ans as a result right up to thus game nobody thought it was any good except the Dutch player Salo Landau who was gassed by the Nazis at Auschwitz in 1944. Today Stockfish indicates that Steinitz was not wrong...the position is dead equal.} Bc5 10. O-O {Steinitz-Chigorin continued 10.d3 which is just fine, but Chigorin obtained a strong attack which gradually became decisive. Steinitz still claimed that white opening strategy was OK and he can successfully retain his extra Pawn. Fischer doesn't care about the Pawn. Instead, he is playing for the advanatge of the two Bishops.} O-O 11. d3 Bxh3 {The problem for black is how to get an attack going as compensation for the P. At the time 11...Nd5 was comsidered best, but it was assumed that Fischer had investigated yje position and found an improvement. Actually, black has tried several different moves here, including 11...Bxh3, and all seem to lead to a playable position,.Engine evaluation if 11...Bxh3 is that the game is dead even.} (11... Nd5 12. c4 Bxh3 13. cxd5 Bf5 14. Be3 Qxd5 15. Nc3 Qd6 {with roughly equal chances. Socko,M (2462)-Batsiashvili,N (2417) Plovdiv BUL 2014}) 12. gxh3 Qd7 13. Bf3 {Fischer's idea is to return the P in exchange for a position in which he has the two Bs and a sound Q-side majority.} (13. Kg2 Nd5 14. Nc3 Rad8 15. Nxd5 cxd5 16. f4 {equals. Socko,B (2643)-Pavasovic,D (2590) Austria 2009}) 13... Qxh3 {The position is equal.} 14. Nd2 Rad8 15. Bg2 Qf5 16. Qe1 {This idea behind this odd looking move is that the Q is positioned to threaten to win a P after Nf3 and it can also go to the Q-side. A good alternative was 16.Qf3} (16. Rb1 {As far as I know this move, found by the engine, has been overlooked. White threatens a P fork on the B and N and gains the initiative.} Bb6 17. b4 Nb7 18. Qf3 Nd6 19. c4 {Threatening another P fork. White has gotten his Q-side Ps moving with a gain of time.} Bc7 {With the advantage. He has more space, the two Bs and black's c-Pawn is a target.} 20. c5) 16... Rfe8 17. Ne4 Bb6 18. Nxf6+ Qxf6 19. Kh1 {To make way for the R on the g-file.} c5 20. Qc3 {\Somewhat better would have been 20.Qe4 keeping the Q centralized.} Nc6 21. f4 Nd4 22. Qc4 Qg6 23. c3 Nf5 {When this game was played annotators gave Fischer undue credit claiming his position is superior. However, that is not the case. Bisguier has defended well and the chances are equal after the text. In fact, Bisguier could even have gotten the advantage with 23///Nc2!} (23... Nc2 {This unexpected move, plunging the N into white's territory, would have actualy left black woth a slight advantage!} 24. Rb1 exf4 25. Be4 Qe6 26. Qxe6 Rxe6 27. Bxf4 c4 {and black has the initiative.}) 24. fxe5 Rxe5 25. Bf4 Re2 26. Be4 {This move was incorrectly praised because Fischer has set up a dangerous pin. That's true, but 26.Be4 gives black the opportunity to gain a significant advantage. me} (26. Bf3 {was in order. After} Rxb2 27. Rae1 (27. Be5 {as in the game is met by} Ne3 {winning}) 27... Qf6 {with equal chances.}) 26... Rxb2 {[%mdl 8192] What a shame! This capture is a gross blunder. At first glance it looks good though. With a R on the 2md rank and his Q and N menacing white's K-side black appears to have a dangerous position. Bu,t Fischer's two Bs aew poised to strike.} (26... Re8 {keeps the upper hand.} 27. Bf3 Ne3 28. Bxe3 R8xe3 29. Rg1 (29. Bxe2 Rxe2 30. Qxf7+ (30. Rg1 Qc6+ {wins outright.}) 30... Qxf7 31. Rxf7 Kxf7) 29... Rxh2+ 30. Kxh2 Bc7+ 31. Kh1 Qd6 32. Rg2 Rxf3 33. Qe4 Qf6 34. Kg1 Rf5 {It's doubtful that black can win. Five Shootouts were drawn.}) 27. Be5 {This simply wins the N} Re8 28. Rxf5 Rxe5 29. Rxe5 {Black resigned.} 1-0